Free Crimes of Paris: A True Story of Murder, Theft, and Detection by Dorothy Hoobler, Thomas Hoobler Page A

gray-haired Delphi scholar). Croumolle is lying in
     bed, his stocking cap pulled down over his ears, and is startled out of sleep by a telegram: “
Mona Lisa
Stolen.” Croumolle — the Delphi scholar if you please, but I am not protesting, I was laughing so hard — dresses himself
     with clownlike agility, now he puts both feet into one leg of his pants; now one foot into two socks. In the end, he runs
     into the street with his suspenders trailing.… The [next part of] the story is set in the hall of the Louvre, everything excellently
     imitated, the paintings and, in the middle, the three nails 29 on which the
Mona Lisa
hung. Horror; summoning of a comical detective; a shoe button of Croumolle’s as red herring; the detective as shoeshine boy;
     chase through the cafés of Paris; passers-by forced to have their shoes shined; arrest of the unfortunate Croumolle, for the
     button that was found at the scene of the crime naturally matches his shoe buttons. And now the final gag — while everyone
     is running through the hall at the Louvre and acting sensational, the thief sneaks in, the
Mona Lisa
under his arm, hangs her back where she belongs, and takes Velázquez’s
Princess
instead. No one notices him. Suddenly someone sees the
Mona Lisa;
general astonishment, and a note in one corner of the rediscovered painting that says, “Pardon me, I am nearsighted. I actually
     wanted to have the painting next to it.” 30
iv
    What everyone wanted to know — and speculated on endlessly — was where the thief could have gone with what was probably the
     most recognizable artwork in the world. Other than the fingerprint, the only clue was the doorknob, now recovered by the police
     from the gutter outside the museum. The plumber who had opened the stairway door for the man who dropped it there was set
     to work looking at hundreds of photographs of museum employees, past and present. Every sighting of the painting or rumor
     about its whereabouts had to be checked out — and they came in from places as distant as Italy, Germany, Britain, Poland,
     Russia, the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Japan. 31
    As time went on without a solution to the case, many concluded that a gang of professional thieves had been at work. The only
     previous art theft comparable to this one had been the abduction of Gainsborough’s
Duchess of Devonshire
from a London gallery in 1876. The man who carried out that heist was Adam Worth, a German-born American whose international
     career as a thief earned him the nickname the Napoleon of Crime. Said to have been the inspiration for Professor Moriarty,
     the archcriminal of the Sherlock Holmes stories, Worth had stolen the Gainsborough from a London gallery and had tried to
     obtain a ransom for its return. When that plan fell through, he took the work back to the United States, where it hung in
     Worth’s Chicago house for the next quarter century. Some have suggested that Worth valued it as a trophy, even an object of
     desire, too much to accept any ransom for it. The Gainsborough did not surface until 1901, after further negotiations with
     the original owner through a friend of Worth’s, a Chicago gambler named Pat Sheedy, who announced a year later that Worth
     had died and was buried under an alias in a London cemetery.
    Despite Sheedy’s claim, a popular historical novelist named Maurice Strauss published an article in one of France’s largest
     newspapers,
Le Figaro,
declaring that Worth was still alive and had duplicated his most famous crime by stealing the
Mona Lisa.
Strauss, who claimed to have seen Worth in 1901, reported that on reading the description provided by the museum plumber
     of the
Mona Lisa
’s thief (“a man of fifty years, handsome in feature, figure, and carriage, height a little above the average, the eyes keen
     and cold”), he was certain it must be Worth. “There is only one man in the world who would have acted with such tranquil audacity
     and so