sofa. He crossed his legs and tented his hands, looking at Thomas with his piercing hazel eyes.
âHow are you?â he asked. âIt was September, wasnât it, when you lost your little girl?â
Thomas took a deep breath and nodded. âI have good days and bad days. Itâs about what you would expect.â
âHmm.â Junger paused reflectively. âWhen Margie and I lost Morgan, I felt like I was underwater. I had no idea where the surface was.â
Thomas had heard the story from his father. Jungerâs sixteen-yearold daughter had been killed in a head-on collision with a logging truck a decade ago.
âAn apt description,â Thomas replied, wishing Junger would get on with it.
âDo you know what brought me back, what gave me a sense of purpose again?â
Thomas shook his head.
âIt was Margieâs idea. She told me I needed to take a break from the firm. I remember laughing at her. When youâre a partner, youâll understand: there is never a good time to get away. In the end, though, she didnât leave me much choice. So I called up Bobby Patterson, who was then dean at Virginia, and asked if he could use an old warhorse in the classroom for a year. Teaching was the best decision I could have made. It gave me new life.â
Junger fell silent, and Thomas waited for the axe to fall. A clock ticked nearby. It was the only sound in the office, other than the hammering of his heart.
âI spoke to Mark Blake,â Junger said, confirming Thomasâs suspicions. âHe told me about the Samuelson case.â
Thomas pursed his lips but made no preemptive defense.
âMy sense is that Mark overreacted, but you have to understand the pressure heâs been under, leading the effort in the courtroom. Wharton Coal has paid this firm over twenty million dollars in the course of our representationâa huge fee. Jack Barrows, Whartonâs chief, desperately wanted us to keep the jury from seeing that morbid simulation of the blowout. All those computer-generated children running for their lives. The sludge catching up to them. The little markers where the bodies lay, red for boys, blue for girls. It was inflammatory, prejudicial, and predicated on any number of unprovable assumptions. You know the argument. You wrote the brief.â
Thomas nodded.
âThe Samuelson case was the linchpin of Markâs argument. Who can blame him? The judge who wrote the opinion was a friend of Judge Hirschelâs. It had all that beautiful language about the dangers of unscientific evidence designed to exploit the juryâs passions. As you can imagine, Mark was humiliated when Judge Hirschel told him the Third Circuit had overturned the decision. And Jack Barrows was apoplectic. I think Jack overreacted too. My guess is that the judge would have let the plaintiffs show the simulation to the jury anyway. But Barrows blamed Mark for the fact that the simulation came into evidence.â
Junger eyed him closely. âNone of this is surprising to you, I imagine.â
Thomas shook his head.
âBut thereâs more, and this is confidential. After the verdict was handed down, Barrows threatened to sue the firm for malpractice. The threat is still on the table. Only a few people know that at this stage. Weâre hopeful the appeal will sort things out.â
Thomas blanched. He had no idea the coal company had taken the issue so far.
âIn any event,â Junger went on, âIâm sure your perspective of what happened is different from Markâs. But none of that matters. Mark has taken a beating, and the client needs to be reassured. There were some who suggested drastic measures, but I intervened. I told them it wasnât your fault. It was the fault of the firm. We made the mistake together.â Junger held out his hands magnanimously. âAnd we have to bear the consequences together.â
Junger paused and then changed