as well––a commemoration of Christ through (in the form of) Charlemagne.
Note, however, that this relationship between Charlemagne and Christ functioned as
an analogy, not an equivalence. In a way that echoes the relationship between exegetical
figures and fulfillments, Charlemagne was not another Christ but a Christ-type,
sanctified and elevated ‘to at least the rank of holy’.73
Before the middle of the twelfth century, the real movement in Charlemagne’s
sanctification occurred locally, independent of royal or imperial prompting––again,
in the religious houses scattered throughout Charlemagne’s old empire.74 In East
Francia, there is evidence of local liturgical veneration of Charlemagne from the
tenth to early twelfth centuries at Cologne, Halberstadt, Hildesheim, Münster,
Neustadt-am-Main, Sitten, and Verden, while commemoration of Charles at
Gellone may have begun as early as the eleventh century.75 But contrary to Robert
Folz’s assertion that the empire was effectively ‘where the idea of the sanctity of
71 Remensnyder, Remembering, 165–7, quotation at 167.
72 ‘Patriarcha Hierosolymitanus desiderans eum honorare, multumque placere ei, miserat illi ab
Hierosolymis per Zachariam . . . illud Dominicae Crucis venerabile cunctisque mortalibus adorandum
phylacterium, gemmarum splendoribus et auro purissimo [etc.]. . . . Haec tibi semper erunt nostrae
dilectionis vera et certissima signa, frequens recordatio, memoria sempiterna, Haud enim dubium, quia
quoties cumque haec sancta vel oculis aspexeris, vel manibus tenueris, Domini tui Caroli oblivisci non poteris.’ Vita s. Willelmo monachi Gellonensis, AASS, 6 May: 805. English tr. from Remensnyder,
Remembering, 169.
73 Remensnyder, Remembering, 171. Stephen Nichols has also noted how Charlemagne in effect
mediated the christological representations of medieval rulers. For example, Charles the Bald first had to ‘emulate the models of Solomon and Charlemagne, and then Christ’. Stephen G. Nichols, Jr.,
Romanesque Signs: Early Medieval Narrative and Iconography (New Haven, Conn., 1983), 85–8,
quotation at 85. See the discussion of figure-fulfillment relationships in Erich Auerbach, ‘Figura’, in Scenes from the Drama of European Literature (New York, 1959) 11–76; and Jean Danielou, From
Shadows to Reality, tr. Wulstan Hibberd (Westminster, Md., 1960). Contemporary society was also
exhibiting an increasing devotion to Christ at that time. Rachel Fulton, From Judgment to Passion:
Devotion to Christ and the Virgin Mary, 800–1200 (New York, 2002), 7–192.
74 On the reticence of the West Franks to pursue canonization, see Robert Folz, ‘Aspects du culte
liturgique de Saint Charlemagne en France’, in KdG iv. 77–80.
75 Robert Folz, Études sur le culte liturgique de Charlemagne dans les églises de l’Empire (Paris, 1951), 15–38; Matthias Zender, ‘Die Verehrung des Hl. Karl im Gebiet des mittelalterlichen Reiches’, in
KdG iv. 108–11; and Amy Remensnyder, ‘Topographies of Memory: Center and Periphery in High
The Birth of a Frankish Golden Age
29
Charlemagne was born’, Remensnyder has shown how widespread a phenomenon
this process of sanctification actually was and how this process took a number of
forms other than liturgical commemoration in local religious communities.76 For
example, besides his increasing association with Christ, anecdotes from Charlemagne’s
life came more and more to mirror those found in hagiography.77 Just as with
St Willibrord, a prophecy heralded Charles’s birth in an eleventh-century manuscript
from Fulda, in which St Boniface told Charles’s father Pepin that Charles will ‘possess
the whole of the kingdom and expunge all error from the church’.78 Much like
St Romuald of Ravenna, Charlemagne received visions, such as his prophetic Visio
written during the reign of Louis the German, or the one recounted in the early
eleventh-century Chronicon Novaliciense,
Dean Wesley Smith, Kristine Kathryn Rusch
Martin A. Lee, Bruce Shlain