Free The Murder of Jeffrey Dryden: The Grim Truth Surrounding Male Domestic Abuse by Troy Veenstra Page B

reserve?
There are several answers to this question, though there are only
two main thoughts, two main answers that come to my mind. The first
is the use of Social Conditioning, (which I touched on in a
previous chapter) through repetitive comments, thoughts and ideas
not originally our own design. Displayed upon us by (yes you
guessed it) the media and other forms of authority, which dictates
to us what is right and what is wrong, what is tolerable vs. the
intolerable.
    As you sit there reading this, you may
think that your actions are dictated not by what others think
and/or do around you but by your own moral compass and for the most
part I agree with that thought, however, not everything we do, not
everything we’ve accepted as moral and justifiable are our original
thoughts.
    Case in point, (and this may seem a
little too simple of an example but the ideal concept is the same)
when you were a toddler, your parents “conditioned,” you to dress
in public and to go to the restroom to relief yourself instead of
just going wherever you were standing. This conditioning continues
to this day, though you can choose to run around naked in public,
but by doing so, society, in of itself, will place its own social
condition upon you.
    Taking this to the next step, for the
most part, parents have conditioned their sons to never hit a girl.
Society has created laws to that event, and the Feminist Movement
has taken that conditioning a step further to condition society
through repetition in every facet of the media to instill the ideal
concept that man, being “all-powerful” cannot be abused by the
“all-powerless” woman.
    However, as with all societies there
will always be those few that stand out above the rest. Which speak
from our own hearts and care not for what society deems as correct
but for what we have found to be correct.
    It is with these people that the second
answer to the question comes to mind, which is the lack of
accessibility to the truth. Currently, if you were to go to the
internet and try to look up information on male domestic abuse on
any search engine, you would more than likely find pages upon pages
of sites and information pertaining to men abusing women but
nothing on women abusing men.
    This is because the facts behind female
domestic violence against men by women are not voluntarily
available to the public. Why is it not easily accessible? To answer
this fully we need to go back to the feminist cannon stated above
and apply it to the government’s inception of circular
reasoning.
    The concept of circular reasoning is
where one provides evidence for the validity of an assertion, which
assumes the validity of the assertion. Confused? Good, that is the
basic concept of the ideals behind Circular Reasoning. Examples of
circular reasoning would be something like, “A is true because B is
true and B is true because A is true,” or “there isn’t a problem
with the law, because if everyone obeyed the law there wouldn’t be
a problem.”
    Thus, by applying the feminist prime
cannon, which states, “No aspect of the male/female relations can
be considered as fact without first accepting the male as all
powerful and the female as completely powerless.” The government
and the media have applied their own “circular reasoning,” by
unofficially stating, “Females cannot abuse men as men are all
powerful, and all powerful men cannot be abused by powerless
women.” Consequently, any and all studies done which show men as
being abused by women are false under the construct of this
reasoning.
    Do you think this is nothing more than
conjecture? If so, perhaps you can explain why the US Department of
Justice, which administers grants to researches on domestic related
violence, has refused funding research on female violence against
men by demanding that all male victimization be ignored (Davis,
2010). Furthermore, perhaps you could also explain why House
Resolution 590, (created by the 110th US