media came to hear of it and we kept it that way.â
I said, âYouâre sure it was McKinley?â
âEverything the pathologist documented about the body fitted the description the daughter gave us and the more detailed one that Mr Bachelor provided.â
Hank said, âI didnât tell you, Cliff. Our client said that her father had broken his right arm and his left shoulder in different falls from his bike.â
âThat checked out,â Gunnarson said. âWe found that McKinley was a blood donor. His DNAâs on record and thatâs being matched, but I donât think thereâs any doubt.â
Hank took a notebook from his pocket. âWhen was the body found?â
Gunnarson looked at his watch. âClose to seventy-two hours ago.â
âAnd how long since he was killed?â
âNot long. That rainstorm we had last Friday probably contributed to dousing the fire.â
I felt the weight of that. McKinley was alive when our investigation began. Another thing thatâd be hard to convey to Margaret, but that wasnât my only problem.
âI have to ask,â I said, âwhy are you giving us all this protected information? And, with respect, why is DS Roberts here?â
Dickersen tapped the file in front of him. âMr Bachelor and you have the inside track on this matter. As an apparent case of murder this is particularly serious in its ⦠execution. Weâve decided that we have an advantage in keeping it under wraps. We assume the perpetrators expect us to find the body and for the media to go to town on it. When that doesnât happen they may become anxious.â
Hank said, âYouâre going to keep an eye on the spot in case someone comes to check?â
âThat, too, but we want your cooperation in giving us every scrap of information you have and maintaining the security blanket.â
Hank glanced at me. âIâd say we could guarantee that, Chief Super, but, again with respect, as you say, how good is
your
security?â
âVery good,â Dickersen said.
Hank nodded. âBut not absolute.â
Dickersen shrugged. âWhat is?â
This was new territory for Hank and meâtotal cooperation with the police. The same question occurred to us bothâwas this sharing of information mutual? Hank asked for a few minutes for us to confer and we went into a huddle at the far end of the table while the police did the same at their end. We mapped out a strategy.
When we reassembled, I said, âYou spoke of us informing our client of her fatherâs death. Thatâd be a breach of this security, wouldnât it?â
âWeâd ask you to withhold the information for a time while the investigation proceeds.â
âThatâd be deception on our part and would cost her money,â Hank said.
âSome measure of compensation might be possible.â
âThatâs very vague,â I said. âTell you what, we do have some additional information that could be relevant, and weâll share it with you.â
âGood,â Dickersen said.
âOn the condition that a question we have is answered. That is, that DS Roberts tells us where she fits in and we decide weâre happy with her explanation.â
At a nod from Dickersen, she took a notebook from her pocket and cleared her throat. I gave her an encouragingsmile, which she ignored. âAt Inspector Gunnarsonâs direction, I interviewed the assistant to the CEO at Tarelton Explorationsâa Ms Barbara Guy. The CEO, Edward Tarelton, AO, is out of the country on business, allegedly. Ms Guy gave me copies of a whole bunch of documents relating to Henry McKinleyâs employment, but refused to tell me anything about his area of research or what field investigations he might have done.
âI asked if Dr McKinley had had a secretary or an assistant I could interview and she said he hadnât. I asked who