Free School Pranks by Lousia Evelyn Carter Page A

Problems causing this unnecessary assignment were plain ole cotton picking jealousy, prejudice, and the like.  Looking at them Miss Forest saw no bashfulness into their character.  They were bold. They did what they thought was necessary to get their point over to Miss Forest.  Miss Forest emphasized in her classes several activities that enhanced the quality of citizenship.  But Mr. Murphy and Ms. Green seemed to abhor them, especially:
    1. Current events
    2. The memorization of (learn by heart)      patriotic songs              
    3. Keep classroom (school) clean (put paper in trash cans.)
     
         Ms. Green had recently been promoted to administrative level.  One of her first acts was to observe one of Miss Forest’s classes.  She visited the entire class period and enjoyed it.  At that time Miss Forest was not aware of the depth of the violent hostility these administrators held toward her.  Ms. Green and Mr. Murphy worked diligently to prove Miss Forest’s unfitness and documented their findings.  That was a great loss for education.  These educators who were trusted by the government were ruining themselves and were not aware of it.  They spent much valuable time trying to disprove Miss Forest’s Grade “A” Certificate and her superior performance in the classroom.  Instead of improving quality, they worked hard to disprove it.  All data gathered against Miss Forest proved it had been manufactured; therefore such information was unreliable, tainted and worthless.  In the meantime though, this data proved these administrators were detrimental to the education system.  Their over zealous act backfired on themselves causing undesired results.  While getting Miss Forest fired, citizens wondered at their reason to act so contrary to the norm.  These administrators have little respect for high academic performance.  Did they expect students to use their decision as model in classroom performance?  From this silly prank administrators have furnished students with an excuse for performing below ability.
     
     

 
     
     
     
    Ms. Green: Evaluator
     
     
         The pattern of forcing educators into retirement used by Dromedary school system is degrading and detrimental.  Teachers in senior citizen range are capable of performing as well as and sometimes better than younger teachers.  After all, “Experience is the best teacher.”  Everything is an art.  A teacher who wants to teach past retirement age has to have a love of teaching.  Only a few have a love of that kind.  As long as desired results can be produced, a Class “A” teacher should be allowed to determine the retirement date.  Those persons and their years are truly golden, priceless.  A special delight, a gem!  
     
         Legal action was taken by Miss Forest to stop this ruthless fate.  This action was taken to accommodate teachers from being forced out of the profession by thoughtless administrators – at will.
     
         From the transcript of the deposition of Pearl Green, case: Dr. Clark Regent vs. Mary Forest 07-12-02, Ms. Green responds to an evaluation she made of Miss Forest the year before.  Ms. Green admits “I was wrong to sign this (perfect evaluation score sheet) of Miss Forest.  Ms. Green hinted she rated Miss Forest Perfect to be cooperative.  There were two evaluators of Miss Forest; Ms. Green and a co-worker.  She blamed her error of scoring Miss Forest Perfect due to her flaws of shyness, and timidity.  Listening to her explanation, it seemed she had a feeling of being intimidated.  But neither of those terms – shyness, timidity, or intimidated can be associated with Ms. Green.  It’s not known whether she desired to be as she described herself or not.  But that conclusion can be determined from the presentation of additional information in her (Ms. Green) role as an evaluator of Miss Forest. 
     
         Ms. Green proved she was plainly out-of-it by