talking about prioritization of resources. It seemed he wanted to take a leaf out of the Metâs book: that if officers thought there was no chance of getting a result, they shouldnât pursue investigations.
Fortunately, it wasnât Fran who interrupted, but someone heâd always suspected was a bit of a yes-man. âMight one ask, sir, what sort of crime we might not investigate? Are we to have official guidelines?â There was so much irony in the manâs voice that Mark was surprised it didnât drip all over the floor. Amazing how oneâs opinion of another could be changed by two sentences.
As he stared at the floor, he mentally reviewed all the cases heâd pursued just because he wanted justice to be done. Sometimes it was impossible to bring the miscreant to court â perhaps a witness was too old or frail. But at least the scrote that had committed the offence knew that the Law was after him, that the police had him in their sights. Not to investigate? The words of his resignation letter began to shape themselves in his head, arranging themselves into well-ordered clauses, not management-speak clunking phrases, either, the sort that must have George Orwell spinning in his grave â except Orwell would have hated that cliché too.
Now Wren was talking about meetings to establish priorities. Mark had a terrible fear that long-unsolved crimes, Franâs cold cases, would not be high on the list. Meanwhile, people as angry as him were firing off notional crimes â domestic violence and rape, for instance, both types of violence with poor conviction rates. Or drunken assaults. Orâ
Wren declared, in a tone not admitting any more argument, that talks would involve colleagues from the Crown Prosecution Service and other police services.
By now people were definitely looking at Mark. Were they expecting some support â which he would have liked to give â or some bland welcome? The silence grew. There were mutters.
Stepping into the breach time, then.
âThank you, Mr Wren, for a most interesting synopsis ââ (he wouldnât use the word summation wrongly, not for anyoneâs money) â âof the policies our masters would like us to consider. Iâm sure we all look forward to detailed discussions with you as you settle into post.â Looking round, he gathered up familiar eyes and led the politest round of applause heâd ever heard. Too late it dawned on him that the people the eyes belonged to might be regarding him as a figurehead in their all too obvious rebellion.
Fran might have been reading his mind. She contrived to hang back as his colleagues streamed â or possibly steamed â from the room. It was unlike her, as was the way she tucked her arm into his. âDidnât Wat Tyler come from Kent?â she murmured as they drifted slowly along the corridor.
âYou expect me to march on London?â
âMaybe not. Poor Wat didnât have a happy ending, did he? But at least youâll be able to keep the brakes on this Happy Chappyâs little schemes.â
âPossibly. Fran, Iâve never been keen on trades unions and strikes, but my God, I can see why we need them. Sack all the highly-trained, efficient, experienced people we utterly depend on and bring in squads of unpaid do-gooders? I thought community support officers were policing on the cheap. But this!â
She brought him to a stop. âItâs not exactly news, Mark.â
âI know. But to hear the man embracing it! Dear God! All my life Iâve fought crime, and now it seems Iâve got to fight management. I know it involves you too,â he added belatedly. âAt least youâve got real cases to tackle. You can still make a difference, as we always wanted to do. But all I shall be fighting is this runt of a civil servant.â
âSweetheart,â she said quietly, âyou donât have to. Thereâs