Free Rogue Lawyer by John Grisham Page B

their lies as if they’re reading Holy Scripture.

13.
    I show the jurors a map of their lovely town. The Pit is far away from the pond; there’s no possible way Gardy could have been in both places at the approximate time the girls were murdered. The jurors don’t believe any of this because they have known for some time that Gardy was a member of a satanic cult with a history of sexual perversion. There is no physical proof that the Fentress girls were sexually assaulted; yet every miserable redneck in this awful place believes Gardy raped them before he killed them.
    At midnight, I’m lying across my lumpy motel bed, 9-millimeter by my side, when my cell phone beeps. It’s the DNA lab in San Diego. The blood Tadeo brutally extracted from the forehead of Jack Peeley matches the strand of hair the murderer left behind in the shoelaces he tightly bound around the ankles of Jenna Fentress, age eleven.

14.
    Sleep is impossible; I can’t even close my eyes. Partner and I leave the motel in the dark and are almost to Milo before we see the first hint of light in the east. I meet with the Bishop in his office as the town slowly comes to life. He calls Judge Kaufman at home, gets him up and out of bed, and at 8:00 a.m. I’m in his chambers with Huver and the court reporter. All of what follows will be on the record.
    I lay out my options. If they refuse to stop the trial, dismiss the case, and send everybody home—and this is what I expect them to do—then I will either (1) issue a subpoena for Jack Peeley, have him hauled into court, put him on the stand, and expose him as the killer; or (2) go to the press with the details of the DNA testing; or (3) announce to the jury what I know; or (4) do all of the above; or (5) do nothing, let them get their conviction, and slaughter them on appeal.
    They demand to know how I obtained a blood sample for Jack Peeley, but I’m not required to tell them. I remind them that for the past ten months I’ve begged them to investigate Peeley, to get a blood sample, and so on, but they have had no interest. They had Gardy, one of Satan’s foot soldiers. For the tenth time I explain that Peeley (1) knew the girls, (2) was seen near the pond when they disappeared, and (3) had just broken up with their mother after a long, violent romance.
    They are bewildered, stunned, at times almost incoherent as reality settles in. Their bogus and corrupt prosecution has just unraveled. They have the wrong man!
    Virtually all prosecutors have the same genetic flaw; they cannot admit the obvious once it’s on the table. They cling to their theories. They know they are right because they’ve been convinced of it for months, even years. “I believe in my case” is one of their favorite lines, and they’ll repeat it mindlessly as the real killer walks forward with blood on his hands and says, “I did it.”
    Because I’ve heard so much of their idiotic bullshit before, I have tried to imagine what Huver might say at this point. But when he says, “It’s possible Gardy Baker and Jack Peeley were working together,” I laugh out loud.
    Kaufman blurts, “Are you serious?”
    I say, “Brilliant, just brilliant. Two men who’ve never met, one eighteen years old, the other thirty-five, join up for about half an hour to murder two little girls, then go their separate ways, never to see each other again and both determined to keep their mouths shut forever. You wanna argue that on appeal?”
    “It wouldn’t surprise me,” Huver says, scratching his chin as if his high-powered brain is clicking right along and sifting through new theories of the crime.
    Kaufman, whose mouth is still open in disbelief, says, “You can’t be serious, Dan.”
    Dan says, “I want to proceed. I think Gardy Baker was involved in this crime. I can get a conviction.” It’s pathetic to watch him plunge onward when he knows he’s wrong.
    “Let me guess,” I say. “You believe in your case.”
    “Damned right I do. I