her backing for a BBC endeavor. Sheâs quite bold.â
âI donât know how we can help her prove such a theory, since thereâs no certainty as to the identity of the Boston Strangler. And probably never will be,â Killien says.
The commissioner sips his whisky. âHer political agenda is unimportant. I know her type all too well. Ordinarily, her attempt to drag us into such a matter would be politically ignored. But it seems thereâs an angle sheâs unaware of, and thatâs why you and I are having this conversation.â
The waiter appears with the pint of stout. Killien takes a big swallow.
âWhen she first approached the Yard about her very old case, as a courtesy, if nothing else, I had the matter looked into, which included finding out something about her. Just the routine checks,â the commissioner continues. âAnd weâve come up with a disturbing bit of informationânot about the case, which frankly matters very little to me. But about Monique Lamont herself, and cash transactions and donations that have come to the attention of the U.S. Treasury Department. Turns out her name is in the Defense Intelligence Agencyâs database.â
Killien abruptly sets down his pint of stout. âSheâs suspected of funneling money to terrorists?â
âIndeed.â
âRight off, what comes to mind is some bureaucratic blunder. Perhaps she suddenly made large wire transfers for legitimate reasons,â Killien suggests.
Happens more often than people realize. Based on what he read in her dossier, like the commissioner, sheâs got millions she didnât acquire on her own, likely moves around a lot of money, pays cash for big purchases in America and abroad, makes generous donations to various organizations. Then he remembers something else he just reviewed. Last fall she suddenly changed political parties. In and of itself, that might well have motivated whoever felt betrayed or offended to seek revenge.
âOf most concern, it seems,â the commissioner is saying, âis a sizable contribution she recently made to a childrenâs relief fund in Romania. A number of these groups, as you know, are fronts for terrorist fund-raising. The one she gave to, in particular, is suspected of trafficking in orphans, supplying them to Al-Qaeda so they can be used as suicide bombers and such.â
He tells Killien there was quite a lot in the press about the donation, about Lamontâs compassion for orphans, which leads Killien to suspect that if the relief fund really is a terrorist front, itâs doubtful Lamont knows. If she knew, why would she hold a press conference about it? Doesnât matter. You donât have to have intent or awareness to be guilty of a crime.
And the commissioner says, âSheâs on a no-fly list but is probably unaware of it since she hasnât tried to book a commercial flight in the past several months. When she does, sheâll begin to realize sheâs being watched. Which is why we need to look into this immediately.â
âIf her assets have been frozen, certainly she would know it.â
âCIA, FBI, DIA leave numerous accounts off the freeze list so possible terrorist funding can be monitored. Itâs likely she has no idea.â
This piques Killienâs own private fears. You never know whoâs riffling through your bank account, e-mails, medical records, or favorite sites on the Internet, until one day you discover your assets are frozen or you canât get on a plane, or agents show up at your business or flat and haul you in for questioning, perhaps deport you to a secret prison in a country that denies it uses torture.
âWhatâs all this got to do with the murder of Janie Brolin and our sudden urgency to look into it?â he inquires.
The commissioner motions for the waiter to bring another whisky, says, âIt gives us an excuse to look into Monique
J. S. Cooper, Helen Cooper