compelling image.
Thereâs a faintly distasteful sexuality in the generalâs naked muscular writhings, the blade just slicing through the neck, the spurting blood that looks more like blood in a paintingâindeed, like red paintâthan like blood in âreal life.â And the nipples visibly hardening under Judithâs white blouse do little to decrease our sense that we are being shown something far more unsavory than a mere murder. Judith seems to share this distaste, asâobserved by a bronzed crone who evokes Leonardoâs sketches of geriatric grotesquesâshe performs her odious task at armâs length and with the repelled determination of a schoolgirl dissecting a frog.
Yet despite its shortcomings, Judith and Holofernes marks a major watershed, a sea change in its creatorâs vision. His first study of sensational violence is also the first work in which a small and theatrically lit cast is posed against a nearly black, almost featureless background, empty but for the furled bloodred cloth that will keep reappearing in his work, above The Death of the Virgin , and half covering the dying Saint John in yet another beheading, this one in the Co-Cathedral of Saint John on the island of Malta.
It may well be that poor Beatrice Cenciâs ghost hovered over the burly, struggling, partly decapitated Holofernes, though itâs just as likely that the success of Caravaggioâs Medusa inspired him to try his hand at another subject involving beheading, blood, homicide, and the instant of death. Surely the artist must have had plenty of opportunity to observe random killing and ceremonial execution, in art as well as life.
For decades, decapitationâalong with all manner of grisly and ingenious methods of achieving martyrdom and imposing it on othersâhad been a hugely popular and rich vein of creative inspiration, encouraged by the cult of martyrdom that swept through the church during the sixteenth century. Around the inside wall of Romeâs round church of Santo Stefano Rotondo is a kind of baroque cyclorama, a cylindrical fresco in sections, each depicting one or more saints in the process of being dismembered, boiled in oil, stabbed, beaten, burned, fed to the lions, and so forthâall painted with an ineptitude and cartoonlike childish glee that makes the effect of the whole all that much more loathsome and disturbing.
However chilling we may find them, the sorry fates of the martyrs were among the inspiriting images that spiked the Jubilee fever of the pilgrims who converged on Rome in 1600 . During a Holy Year, which occurs every quarter centuryâthe last was in 2000 âthe faithful who reach Rome are rewarded by a chance to have every last sin washed away and to return home with souls as clean as those of freshly baptized babies. In solidarity with the three million travelers who arrived in Rome that year, Clement VIII wept copious tears as he made his weekly barefoot visits to the major basilicas, washed the feet of the pilgrims, and invited twelve of them to eat daily at his table. He was notably less generous to the Protestants, Jews, and assorted heretics who were publicly executed and tortured during his pontificate. Perhaps the most famous of these was Giordano Bruno, whoâfor the crime of refusing to recant his views on morality, cosmology, and the nature of the universeâwas led out, naked and muzzled to prevent him from denouncing his tormentors, and burned at the stake, on February 17 , in the Campo deâ Fiori.
This, then, was the societyâviolent and intemperate, suffused by the specter of disaster and the spectacle of merciless death, trafficking in empty promises of salvation without hope, of redemption without a sign of where redemption might be found, of dispensations reduced to the price of an arduous journeyâin which Caravaggio lived. And this was the world he brought with him as he contemplated the bare walls of