dozen years apart.â
âI didnât bring up the subject of Ruth Bishop,â Ford said. âYou did.â
âYou led me into it.â
âBy the way, itâs not exactly easy to fall off a tractor.â
âI wouldnât know. Iâve never tried.â
âThe rumor is that your husband was drunk.â
âSo I heard.â
âWas he?â
âAn autopsy was performed. There was nothing in the report about alcohol.â
âYou said a minute ago that Mr. Osborne lay in a coma for days. All traces of alcohol would have disappeared from the bloodstream during that time.â
âIâm not a doctor. How would I know?â
âI think you know a great deal, Mrs. Osborne. The problem is getting you to admit it.â
âThat was an ungentlemanly remark.â
âI come from a long line of ungentlemen,â Ford said. âYouâd better go back to your place. The recess is over.â
Judge Gallagher was striding back into the courtroom, his black robe flapping around him like the broken wings of a raven.
âRemain seated and come to order,â the clerk said. âSuperior Court is now in session.â
CHAPTER SIX
the name of john loomis was called, and one of the men in ranchersâ clothes came to the witness box and was sworn in: John Sylvester Loomis, 514 Paloverde Street, Boca de Rio; occupation, doctor of veterinary medicine. Dr. Loomis testified that on the morning of October 13, 1967, he was asleep in the apartment above his place of business when he was awakened by someone pounding on the office door. He went downstairs and found Robert Osborne with his dog, Maxie, on a leash.
âI gave him hell, if youâll pardon the expression, for waking me up so early, since Iâd been at a foaling until three oâclock. But he seemed to think it was urgent, that someone had poisoned his dog.â
âWhat was your opinion?â
âI saw no evidence of poison. The dog was lively, his eyes were clear and bright, nose cold, no offensive breath odor. Mr. Osborne said heâd found Maxie in a field before dawn, that the dogâs legs were twitching violently, it was frothing at the mouth and had lost control of its bowels. I persuaded Mr. Osborne to leave the dog with me for a few hours, and he said heâd pick it up on his way home from San Diego in the late afternoon or early evening.â
âAnd did he?â
âYes. About seven oâclock that night.â
âMeanwhile youâd had a chance to examine the dog.â
âYes.â
âAnd what did you find out?â
âNothing absolutely positive. But I was pretty sure it had suffered an epileptic seizure. Such seizures are not uncommon in dogs as they get older, and spaniels like Maxie are particularly susceptible. Once a seizure is over, the dog makes an immediate and complete recovery. Itâs the speed of the recovery, in fact, which helps with the diagnosis.â
âDid you explain this to Mr. Osborne, Dr. Loomis?â
âI made an attempt. But he had this thing in his mind about poison, that the dog had been poisoned.â
âWas there any basis for his belief?â
âNone that I could see,â Loomis said. âI didnât argue with him, though. It seemed a touchy subject.â
âWhy?â
âPeople often identify with their pets. I got the impresÂsion that Mr. Osborne thought someone was trying to poiÂson him.â
âThank you, Dr. Loomis. You may step down now.â
Leo Bishop was called as the next witness. His relucÂtance to take the stand was evidenced by the slowness of his movements and the look of apology he gave Devon as he passed her. When he responded to Fordâs questions about his name and address, his voice was so low that even the court reporter, who was sitting directly below the witÂness box, had to ask him to speak up.
Ford said, âWould you please