asks Mr. Simard to hand the judge a document showing the computerâs serial number and specifications. There is also a sworn affidavit attesting to the absolute truth of the facts reported there. Then he moves on to the main issues. âTell us, Mr. Simard, is it true that a computer such as this records the minute, hour, day, month, and year for every document produced?â
An âObjection, Your Honorâ rings out from Tom Paradisâ lawyer, but the judge instructs the witness to continue. Martin Simard replies, âAbsolutely. The computer automatically indicates the date on which all documents it stores in its memory were created.â
âDoes the user have to initiate that operation?â
âAbsolutely not. Internal software records the data as soon as a new document is created.â
âThat means that if I write a song, say for example âLive in the Dark,â I should be able to find the exact time it was written and saved on the computer?â
âThat is correct.â
âMr. Simard, were you able to search the files on the computer Alex used?â
âYes.â
âWhat about the date on which the song in question was created?â
âYes.â
âWhat was that date, Mr. Simard?â
âFebruary 4 th at 9:29 p.m.â
âCould Alexandre de Vertefeuille or anyone else have changed that date, Mr. Simard?â
âNo.â
âMr. Simard, would you please give the judge a copy of your expert findings?â
Mr. Simard complies while Tom Paradisâ lawyer cries, âObjection, Your Honor!â in an attempt to have Mr. Simardâs testimony ruled inadmissible.
But the judge is interested in hearing more about this new evidence. He asks Mr. Simard if it would be possible for him to see the process with his own eyes. Mr. Simard is happy to comply, especially since Mr. Biron thought to ask him to bring along a computer. The specialist then walks him through a demonstration that so illuminates the subject that the judge deems his testimony wholly admissible.
And just like that, the tide turns. If the judge accepts the testimony, it must mean he agrees that I wrote the song on February 4 th , predating the legal paperwork submitted by Tom Paradis by eight months.
Our opponentâs case lies in ruins. Tom Paradis is livid. Heâs drenched in sweat. No matter what his lawyer says now, his arguments have taken a real hit. He can see his fortune slipping through his fingers, and all because of some stupid computer. Heâs fuming.
On our side, itâs pure joy. Mélanie, Jean-François, and Bruno learn for the first time that Mr. Biron has finally found the secret combination to the safe holding thousands of dollars, our dollars. Of course, no one knows that it all started with my brilliant idea. For the time being, that doesnât matter. Theyâll find out soon enough! Iâm not one to play down my exploits!
We have every reason to celebrate. Mr. Bironâs final argument is a masterpiece of logic and rhetoric. The judge is under his spell. Itâs clear now, victory is ours.
Mr. Biron lays it on thick, asking that the royalties be handed over to us in their entirety and that we receive compensation in the sum of $10,000 for exemplary damages or, failing payment, that a prison sentence be imposed on the accused because of the serious nature of his crime.
The crime is all the more serious, emphasizes Mr. Biron, in that it was perpetrated against minors (thatâs us!). The judge himself canât help but nod as Mr. Biron makes his requests. You should see the expression on Tom Paradisâs face! What pleasure, what joy, what a thrill to see the dramatic transformation.
As impassioned as his lawyer tries to be, he fails to convince. His final argument falls flat, even as it tries to call into question the validity of the prosecutionâs evidence. Me, Iâm laughing inside, imagining Tom Paradis