symbols:
To write the number five, for instance, the Cretan scribe repeated the â1â sign five times:. To write the number fifty, he drew five â10â signs:. Fifty-five was written this way:. And so on, for 555; 5,555; and 55,555. The system went up to 99,999, or. There was no sign for zero.
When he was finished with the numbers, Evans turned to the words. The tablets contained many obvious logogramsâpictographic signs standing for whole words. These often appeared next to numbers to show the thing counted. One cache of tablets, which came to be known as the âArmoury Deposit,â contained inventories of military equipment such as wheels, chariot frames, and javelins. Elsewhere in the palace, Evans came upon a tablet inscribed with the âarrowâ sign,, which tallied large quantities of arrows. Nearby were the remains of a chest with more than eight thousand arrows inside.
There were dozens of logograms in Linear B. To modern eyes, some look highly cryptic, among themand. The meaning of many of these is still debated today.
Others were far more transparent. Some, though conceived in the Bronze Age, are enduringly recognizable, likeand, the Linear B signs for âmanâ and âwoman,â which would be at home today on any restroom door in the world. Others, including these, were also easily understood:
Evans also identified pairs of related logograms that appeared to stand for male and female animals. One sign in each pair was written with two crosshatches on its stem, while the other had a V-shaped stem. There were signs for stallions and mares; boars and sows; bulls and cows; rams and ewes; and billy goats and nanny goats. Evans could only guess which sign indicated the male of the species and which the female; the elegant answer to this little puzzle, which came from Alice Kober, would not be known until decades later.
Linear B was also awash in logograms denoting vessels of all kinds:
More than five decades after Evans first dug at Knossos, a tablet inscribed with pictures of humble pots like these would unlock the mystery of Linear B once and for all.
BESIDES LOGOGRAMS, LINEAR B contained dozens of nonpictographic signs. These appeared most often in small strings, called âsign-groups,â with the little word-dividers separating each group. These included the ones David Kahn described so evocatively in The Codebreakers : the âGothic arch enclosing a vertical lineâ, the âheart with a stem running through itâ, the âthree-legged dinosaur looking behind himâ, the âbackward Sâand the âtall beer glass . . . with a bow tied on its rimâ.
Then there were the symbols that looked, as Kahn wrote, âlike nothing at all in this world.â Among them were these:
By Evansâs initial count, there were at least eighty such characters, a figure that strongly suggested the presence of a syllabary. A further clue came from the number of characters in each sign-group: there were normally between two and five, which also pointed to a syllabic system. As the anthropologist E. J. W. Barber explains in her book Archaeological Decipherment , counting the signs in each group is another fine diagnostic tool in the deciphererâs arsenal:
The number of signs between word boundaries will give another indication of the type of script. The words of very few languages consistently run to more than five syllables. . . . Consequently if the number of signs between word breaks is usually around two or three, the script is probably syllabic, whereas if the number is more often eight, ten, twelve, or higher, it is most likely alphabetic.
Linear B appeared, then, to be a mixed script, part syllabic, part logographic. (In this respect, it is not unlike modern Japanese writing.) Evans himself suspected as much: The trick of counting characters to pinpoint the type of script was already well known in his day. But though he
Massimo Carlotto, Anthony Shugaar
Clementine Roux, Penelope Silva