on a crowded tube train, and then another, and then another, untilhours and hours passâis unforgettable, and very, very real.
In an online interview, Haddon quotes one of his Amazon reviewers, someone who hated his novel, saying âthe most worrying thing about the book is that Christopher says he dislikes fiction, and yet the whole book is fiction.â And that, says the author, âputs at least part of the problem in a nutshell.â It doesnât, I donât think, because the Amazon reviewer is too dim to put anything in a nutshell. I suspect, in fact, that the Amazon reviewer couldnât put anything in the boot of his car, let alone a nutshell. (Presumably you couldnât write a book about someone who couldnât read, either, or someone who didnât like paper, because the whole book is paper. Oh, man, I hate Amazon reviewers. Even the nice ones, who say nice things. Theyâre bastards too.) But Haddon is right if what heâs saying is that picking through a book of this kind for inconsistencies is a mugâs game, and Iâm sorry if thatâs what Iâve done. The part that made me wince a little seemed more fundamental than an inconsistency, though.
This comes up again in Patrick Hamiltonâs brilliant Hangover Square , where the central character suffers from some kind of schizophrenia. At periodic intervals he kind of blacks out, even though he remains conscious throughout the attacks. (âIt was as though a shutter had fallenâ; âas though one had blown oneâs nose too hard and the outer world had become suddenly dimâ; âas though he had been watching a talking film, and all at once the sound-track had failedââbecause George Bone cannot properly recall the last attack, he searches for fresh ways to describe each new one.) And of course it doesnât quite make sense, because he doesnât know what heâs doing when the attacks occur, except he does, really; and he doesnât know who anyone is anymore, except he manages to retain just enough information to make Hamiltonâs plot work. And it really doesnât matter, because this book isnât about schizophrenia. Itâs about an exhausted city on the brink of warâitâs set in London at the beginning of 1939âand about shiftless drunken fuckups, and it feels astonishingly contemporary and fresh. You may remember that I wanted to read Hamilton because my current favorite rock-and-roll band is naming an album after one of his books, and if that seems like a piss-poor (and laughably unliterary) reason to dig out a neglected minor classic, well, Iâm sorry. But I got there in the end, and Iâm glad I did. Thank you, Marah. Oh, and George Bone in schizophrenic modehas a hilarious and unfathomable obsession with a town called Maidenhead, which is where I grew up, and which has been for the most part overlooked, and wisely so, throughout the entire history of the English novel. Bone thinks that when he gets to Maidenhead, everythingâs going to be all right. Good luck with that, George!
I bought Mark Salzmanâs True Notebooks a couple of months ago, after an interview with the author in this magazine. I am beginning belatedly to realize that discovering books through reading about them in the Believer , and then writing about them in the Believer âas I have done once or twice beforeâis a circular process that doesnât do you any favors. Youâd probably like to read about a book you didnât read about a while back. Anyway, as the interview implied, this is a pretty great book, but, boy is it sad.
True Notebooks is about Mark Salzmanâs gig teaching writing at Central Juvenile Hall in LA, where just about every kid is awaiting trial on a gang-related murder charge. Salzmanâs just the right person to attempt a book of this kind. Heâs empathetic and compassionate and all that jazz, but heâs no