26:6-10). Nevertheless,
God ensures that everything turns out well for the Israelites and
badly for their enemies.
The second great foundation story is that of Moses and the
Exodus, which also confronts “us” (that is, “Israel”) with “them”
(that is, “the nations”) as Moses urges Pharaoh to let the
Hebrews leave Egypt. Yet the narrator insists that it was God
himself who increasingly hardened Pharaoh’s heart, lest he
relent and relieve the suffering of Moses and his own people—
and why? God, speaking through Moses, threatens Pharaoh with
devastat-
THE SOCIAL HISTORY OF SATAN / 37
ing slaughter and concludes by declaring, “but against any of the
Israelites, not a dog shall growl— so that you may know that the
Lord makes a distinction between the Egyptians and Israel ”
(Exod. 11:7; my emphasis).
Many anthropologists have pointed out that the worldview of
most peoples consists essentially of two pairs of binary
oppositions: human/not human and we/they.3 Apart from
anthropology, we know from experience how people
dehumanize enemies, especially in wartime.
That Israel’s traditions deprecate the nations, then, is no
surprise. What is surprising is that there are exceptions. Hebrew
tradition sometimes reveals a sense of universalism where one
might least expect it. Even God’s election of Abraham and his
progeny includes the promise of a blessing to extend through
them to all people, for that famous passage concludes with the
words, “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed”
(Gen. 12:3). Furthermore, when a stranger appears alone, the
Israelites typically accord him protection, precisely because they
identify with the solitary and defenseless stranger. Biblical law
identifies with the solitary alien: “You shall not wrong or
oppress a stranger; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt”
(Exod. 22:21). One of the earliest creeds of Israel recalls that
Abraham himself, obeying God’s command, became a solitary
alien: “A wandering Aramean was my father . . .” (Deut. 26:5).
Moses, too, was the quintessential alien, having been adopted as
an infant by Pharaoh’s daughter. Although a Hebrew, he was
raised as an Egyptian; the family of his future in-laws, in fact,
mistook him for an Egyptian when they first met him. He even
named his first son Gershom (“a wanderer there”), saying, “I
have been a wanderer in a foreign land” (Exod. 2:16-22).
Nevertheless, the Israelites are often aggressively hostile to
the nations. The prophet Isaiah, writing in wartime, predicts that
the Lord will drive the nations out “like locusts” before the
Israelite armies (Isa. 40:22). This hostility to the alien enemy
seems to have prevailed relatively unchallenged as long as Israel’s
empire was expanding and the Israelites were winning their wars
against the nations. Psalms 18 and 41, attributed to King David,
builder
38 / THE ORIGIN OF SATAN
of Israel's greatest empire, declare, “God gave me vengeance and
subdued the nations under me” (Ps. 18:47), and “By this I know-
that God is pleased with me—in that my enemy has not
triumphed over me” (Ps. 41:11).
Yet at certain points in Israel’s history, especially in times of
crisis, war, and danger, a vociferous minority spoke out, not
against the alien tribes and foreign armies ranged against Israel,
but to blame Israel’s misfortunes upon members of its own
people. Such critics, sometimes accusing Israel as a whole, and
sometimes accusing certain rulers, claimed that Israel’s
disobedience to God had brought down divine punishment.
The party that called for Israel's allegiance to “the Lord alone,”
including such prophets as Amos (c. 750 B.C.E.), Isaiah (c. 730
B.C.E.), and Jeremiah (c. 600 B.C.E.), indicted especially those
Israelites who adopted foreign ways, particularly the worship of
foreign gods.4 Such prophets, along with their supporters,
thought of Israel as a