Free Women and Men by Joseph McElroy Page B

gratefully in, bravo bravo bravo, he can smell already the lasagne verde, the forbidden mussel-shrimp-and-oyster-stuffed striped bass, the artichoke stuffed with mor-tadella, and before the liquid freckled pear or fleshly orange persimmon, the ripe blue gorgon foiled in the oven then mashed with sweet butter (and give us a soft nugget of ash-enveloped chevre!) and through all this across the restaurant table his friend with a roslein in the button hole and such fingers on the keys to one’s self as even the great cogent Verdi could not compose!
    Elsewhere in a broad-based effort to recycle, they’ve started without us, and we need to get over there, as if not there already bringing our prestressed flange units in postponement of perhaps pain, whatever news pain is. What, though, have they started? A woman looks forward and backward to have a baby naturally with her husband; elsewhere, another does the same if she only knew it, and meanwhile lies incarnate in a motel bed near Cape Kennedy hearing from her new lover, who does not dream, dream-like memories murmured till she can’t stay awake no more no more; elsewhere, a man tries to hear what his new lover instructs him to hear, like a third party between them—news to him. Oh, these people, many more, are sharply felt yet minimally known, of an articulate community that is our representative blood but, like inmost organs and habits, unknown to us or word we bring sealed by the sender, whose parting words were that there is no neutral messenger.
    For in this brief-turned age or interlocking place we were thrust back to the drawing board. To find that our understanding could prove to be just plain light—for there’s no reason to think angels can’t learn too—while light in our case had recently proved sometimes sound. And, given off from us, this sound had more to it or less depending on the viewer’s place—that is, how much you were, and where you were coming from, and how. What mattered, though, was that among all points of view the more Much averaged a shade greater than the less. So we had not just differences in point of view: we had a net more Much given off, and this might mean so much in the long run that the shade greater More felt downright massive. And so we chose for Much the new term Mass.
    Yet how came this net More? From the sound at source in us. Even us in the sound. Trying to know when our tenant angels spoke in us.
    But given a net More given off, the source must suffer net loss. Net loss of mass material which could be weighed. Which meant (we had to think) that sound had weight. So weight in some state might have sound. Yet if our light was only sound, sound could well be light. If so, light too had weight (which became it never so much as in the losing of it).
    This was hard. But actually not on us. Beset by abstraction we many of us thought to hang in a little longer. If light had weight to its mass and on good days proved relatively endless, must not we its sometime source be endless, too?
    Whether or not we needed it in this seeming endless supply, it seemed to need us less. We hated to lose light like that. Yet coming to us, leaving us constantly, it seemed still to know its place. Which we kept it in. That is, its place of use to us. For reading. For gardening at sunset. For cave weekends. For open-ended incandescence. For seasonal definition, if at times light’s swift generalizing power transcended such particulars as that Chile was not South America, New York not the Capital, the Statue of Liberty not art. Lately, we used light for Obstacle Manipulation, where Eye-light means Contact, and we had learned by chance that at a distance and without touching we might move a plum away from a lemon if not toward ripeness; move a person—say, one half turn; or move a mountain with its half-known contents, yet do so only so long as we saw the movable thing as in a beautiful relation to us (thus Optical Kinaesthesia). And first and last, we used