without all the cultural and ideological baggage that
invariably accompanies the whole Eastern gestalt, and for that matter, spiritu-
ality as it is often spoken about (Jon Kabat-Zinn, personnal communication,
2008).
The clinical areas of use of mindfulness-based treatment today are
extremely broad, and various outcome studies have highlighted the clinical
relevance of these forms of treatment with respect to a variety of disorders.
Mindfulness is a key component of several standardized therapy models,
most of which are included in the cognitive-behavioral approach as will be
widely illustrated in this handbook: the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction
(MBSR) protocol (Kabat-Zinn, 1990), perhaps the first model involving a
Introduction
11
clinical application of mindfulness, which has been found to be effective in
the treatment of various anxiety disorders, especially GAD, panic disorder,
and social phobia (Kabat-Zinn et al., 1992; Borkovec & Sharpless, 2004;
Miller, Fletcher, & Kabat-Zinn, 1995); the Mindfulness-Based Cognitive
Therapy (MBCT) model (Segal et al., 2002), an integration of cognitive
therapy and MBSR, which has been found to be effective in significantly
reducing the relapse rate in major depression; the integration between
evolutionary psychology and compassion in psychotherapy by Paul Gilbert
(2005);
Marsha
Linehan’s
Dialectical-Behavioral
Dialectrical-Behavioral
Theraphy (DBT) model, which comprises an important mindfulness-based
treatment component and which has demonstrated significant effectiveness
in reducing multi-impulsive and suicidal behaviors in patients suffering from
borderline personality disorder (Linehan, 1993a, b); and the Acceptance and
Commitment Therapy (ACT; Hayes et al., 1999), which is consistent with
mindfulness approaches though it does not explicitly include mindfulness or
meditation training. In this last therapy method, patients learn to recognize
an observing self able to see their own thoughts, emotions, and body
sensations and view them as separate from themselves. In addition to these,
as will be well described in Parts 3 and 4 of the handbook, there are at this
moment several other relevant application of mindfulness-based approaches
for many different psychological disorders in various clinical settings and
across diverse populations.
Regarding the state of the art (see also Chapter 3 of this volume), Baer’s
(2003) judgment after reviewing the empirical literature is that “mindfulness-
based interventions can be rigorously operationalized, conceptualized, and
empirically evaluated” (p. 140) and that at present they meet the American
Psychological Association Division 12 designation as “probably efficacious.”
Studies of the effectiveness of these approaches are encouraging, but further
investigation with more randomized and controlled studies is still required.
It would be important to conduct methodologically sound empirical evalua-
tions of the effects of mindfulness interventions for a range of problems, both
in comparison to other well-established interventions and as a component of
treatment packages.
We also need to better understand which mindfulness-based interventions
work and for whom, and which strategies work best for particular patients
and conditions. It will be possible to reach these goals by developing valid
and reliable measures of mindfulness (see Chapter 9 of this volume), allow-
ing measurement of mindfulness and its components and the associations
between them and clinical change.
Another central issue to be investigated in working with psychological
problems is whether or not there are particular brain processes associated
with specific clinical conditions that mindfulness practice either augments or
reduces. We also have to improve our understanding of the cognitive, emo-
tional, behavioral, biochemical, and neurological factors that contribute to
the state of mindfulness and