weapon.â
âNever found.â He pulled a face. âBeswick said heâd chucked it away â wouldnât or couldnât say where.â
âWas it his knife?â
âNo. He said it was at the cottage, on the work surface. When Charlie came at him, Beswick grabbed it. One stab wound to the stomach. But Beswickâs narrative of events matched everything at the scene. Everything,â he repeated, locking those large eyes on mine. âThere were no loose ends, no discrepancies. Heâs wasting your time.â
Personally I thought the absence of the murder weapon was rather a loose end but I didnât want to aggravate him. I wasnât going to just drop it, though. âDid you interview him?â I asked.
âNo.â He took another sip of his tea.
I was disappointed, thinking he wouldnât have as much information if he hadnât heard it first-hand. âBut Damien was at the cottage,â I pointed out. âHeâd have picked up details from being there, wouldnât he, even if he hadnât been the one to attack Charlie? Like where the body was and the fact that Charlie had been stabbed?â
Sinclairâs eyes, wide and glassy, like blue mints, bore into me. âItâs possible,â he allowed. His long fingers curled round his mug.
âHow much detail did he give?â I asked. âHe could barely remember anything when I asked him to talk me through it,â I said. âSurely the police would expect it to be coherent and detailed.â
âHeâd taken drugs that day, on the way to the cottage â did he tell you that?â
Annoyance flickered inside me; Sinclair noticed and gave a little nod. If Damien had been doped up, it could well affect his recollection of events.
âWhat youâre not taking into account,â Sinclair said, âis that the detectives talking to him would have been trained in advanced interview techniques. You have a suspect who says they canât remember and there are ways and means to access those memories.â
âLike what?â I was interested professionally, although a major difference between my role and that of the police when talking to people is that I have no authority. The people I speak to can clam up, get up and walk away, refuse to let me over the threshold. I canât âdetainâ anyone for questioning.
Sinclair set down the cup and winced: an irritable, grumpy old man not wanting to explain. Nevertheless, he began to answer my question, his hands gesturing expressively as he spoke. His wrists were bony, jutting from his pullover, and I wondered if he lived alone, and if heâd let mealtimes slide in the weeks since heâd retired.
âTake a mugging,â he began. âItâs all a blur to the victim â didnât get a good look at the mugger and so on. But they do mention it had just started raining. Well, we take that one concrete detail and build on it: what sounds were there when it started raining? Was it cold or warm? Had anyone just passed them? Do they remember what colour coat the person was wearing?â
âAppealing to the senses?â I saw what he meant.
âThatâs what memories are made of.â
Like a smell bringing back a particular time in life, or a piece of music triggering a memory. I thought about it. There had been precious few sense memories in Damienâs story when I spoke to him: âit was freezingâ was one, the smell in the cottage another.
âI wasnât in on those interviews,â Sinclair said. âBeswickâs recollection was hazy at times because of the drugs, but it still fit the known facts. Fit like a glove. Now, if his new version is a load of tripe, then keeping it vague, ill-defined and sketchy is safer for him. If youâre lying you keep it simple, say the minimum, so thereâs less to trip you up. Telling the truth you can elaborate, illustrate your