Free Mary Tudor by David Loades Page B

pp. 321-42; 54 (1968), pp. 23-37.
    9. Rodriguez Salgado, The Changing Face of Empire , pp. 306-7.
    10. Extracts from A Journal of the Travels of Philip II by Jean Vandenesse, printed as an appendix to Cal. Span ., XIII.
    11. Loades, Mary Tudor , pp. 380-3.
    12. ‘The Count of Feria’s Despatch to Philip II of 14 November 1558’, ed. M. J. Rodriguez Salgado and Simon Adams, Camden Miscellany , XXVIII (1984) pp. 319/28.
    13. An epitaphe upon the death of Quene Marie , Society of Antiquaries, Broadsheet 46. Foxe, Acts and Monuments , p. 2,098.
    14. ‘Feria’s despatch’, pp. 320/29.
    15. Philip to the princess dowager of Portugal, 4 December 1558. Cal. Span ., XIII, 440. The letter was written in haste, and mainly about other matters.
    16. Rodriguez Salgado, The Changing Face of Empire , pp. 166-7.
    17. Ibid.
    18. ‘Feria’s despatch’, pp. 320 /29 and note.
    19. Ibid., pp. 25/35. Paget had refused to see Feria privately.
    20. In fact Elizabeth had no particular animus against Boxall, who was a relative nonentity. He was a clerical pluralist on a grand scale, but of the second rank, being warden of New College, Winchester, Archdeacon of Ely and Dean of Peterborough. He became a principal secretary in December 1556.
    21. Her story was written down by her servant, Henry Clifford, appearing in 1887 as The Life of Jane Dormer (cited above).
    22. Cal. Ven ., VII, p. 93. Rowley Williams, ‘Image and Reality’, p. 237.
    23. Feria to Philip, 21 November 1558. Cal. Span ., Elizabeth , I, pp. 1-4.
    24. TNA SP12/1, no. 57.
    25. Strype, Ecclesiastical Memorials , III, pp. 536-50.
    26. Loades, Intrigue and Treason , pp. 250-5.
    27. Rowley Williams, ‘Image and Reality’, p. 243.
    28. Machyn, Diary , p. 178. For a discussion of Machyn’s attitude to Elizabeth (and other things), see Gary G. Gibbs, ‘Marking the Days: Henry Machyn’s Manuscript and the Mid-Tudor Era’, in Duffy and Loades, The Church of Mary Tudor , pp. 281-308.
    29. A Speciall grace, appointed to have been said after a banket at Yorke … in November 1558 (RSTC 7599). BL MS Royal 17. C. III.
    30. Ibid.
    31. Machyn, Diary , p. 180.
    32. These sermons were not officially encouraged, and were banned by proclamation, but not until 27 December. Hughes and Larkin, Tudor Royal Proclamations , II, pp. 102-3.
    33. Intrigue and Treason , p. 271. Machyn, Diary , p. 180.
    34. TNA SP12/1, no. 7. L. S. Marcus, Janel Mueller and M. B. Rose, Elizabeth I. Collected Works (2000), p. 51.
    35. Ibid., pp. 135-50. W. P. Haugaard, ‘Elizabeth Tudor’s Book of Devotions: A Neglected Clue to the Queen’s Life and Character’, Sixteenth Century Journal , 12 (1981), pp. 79- 105.
     
    13 The England of the Two Queens
    1. The Passage of our most dread Sovereign Lady, Queen Elizabeth, through the City of London … (1559), in A. F Pollard, Tudor Tracts , pp. 367-95.
    2. Ibid., p. 387.
    3. Perhaps suspecting her intention, none of the senior bishops of the Church would agree to crown her. It was left to the relatively junior Owen Oglethorpe of Carlisle to perform the ceremony. D. E. Hoak, ‘The Coronations of Edward VI, Mary I and Elizabeth I, and the Transformation of Tudor Monarchy’, in C. S. Knighton and Richard Mortimer (eds), Westminster Abbey Reformed (2003), pp. 114-51.
    4. Proceedings in the Parliaments of Elizabeth I: 1558–1581 , ed. T. E. Hartley (1981), pp. 12-17.
    5. D. Wilkins, Concilia Magnae Brittaniae et Hiberniae (1737), IV, p. 179; translated in Philip Hughes, Rome and the Counter-Reformation in England (1942), pp. 138-9.
    6. J. Strype, Annals of the Reformation (1725), I, pp. 73-81.
    7. Handbook of British Chronology , pp. 227-83. Loades, Elizabeth I , p. 137 and note.
    8. Lucy Wooding, ‘The Marian Restoration and the Mass’, in Duffy and Loades, The Church of Mary Tudor , pp. 227-57.
    9. This friction had culminated in the so-called ‘Reneger incident’ in 1545 when Robert Reneger of Southampton became so exasperated by the attitude of the authorities at