desires in their lyric confessions. The parallel between Don Quixote and
Madame Bovary has become classic. It is always easy to recognize analogies between two
novels of external mediation.
Imitation in Stendhal's work at first seems less absurd since there is less of that divergence
between the worlds of disciple and model which makes a Don Quixote or an Emma Bovary
so grotesque. And yet the imitation is no less strict and literal in internal mediation than in
external mediation. If this seems surprising it is not only because the imitation refers to a
model who is "close," but also because the hero of internal mediation, far from boasting of
his efforts to imitate, carefully hides them.
The impulse toward the object is ultimately an impulse toward the mediator; in internal
mediation this impulse is checked by the mediator himself since he desires, or perhaps
possesses, the object. Fascinated by his model, the disciple inevitably sees, in the mechanical
obstacle which
-39-
he puts in his way, proof of the ill will borne him. Far from declaring himself a faithful
vassal, he thinks only of repudiating the bonds of mediation. But these bonds are stronger
than ever, for the mediator's apparent hostility does not diminish his prestige but instead
augments it. The subject is convinced that the model considers himself too superior to accept
him as a disciple. The subject is torn between two opposite feelings toward his model -- the
most submissive reverence and the most intense malice. This is the passion we call hatred .
Only someone who prevents us from satisfying a desire which he himself has inspired in us is
truly an object of hatred. The person who hates first hates himself for the secret admiration
concealed by his hatred. In an effort to hide this desperate admiration from others, and from
himself, he no longer wants to see in his mediator anything but an obstacle. The secondary
role of the mediator thus becomes primary, concealing his original function of a model
scrupulously imitated.
In the quarrel which puts him in opposition to his rival, the subject reverses the logical and
chronological order of desires in order to hide his imitation. He asserts that his own desire is
prior to that of his rival; according to him, it is the mediator who is responsible for the rivalry.
Everything that originates with this mediator is systematically belittled, although still secretly
desired. Now the mediator is a shrewd and diabolical enemy; he tries to rob the subject of his
most prized possessions; he obstinately thwarts his most legitimate ambitions.
All the phenomena explored by Max Scheler in Ressentiment 1. a re, in our opinion, the result of internal mediation. Furthermore, the word ressentiment itself underscores the quality of
reaction, of repercussion which characterizes the experience of the subject in this type of
mediation. The impassioned admiration and desire to emulate stumble over the unfair
obstacle with which the model seems to block the way of his disciple, and then these passions
recoil on the disciple in the form of impotent hatred, thus causing the sort of psychological
self-poisoning so well described by Scheler.
As he indicates, ressentiment can impose its point of view on even those whom it does not
dominate. It is ressentiment which prevents us, and sometimes prevents Scheler himself, from
recognizing the part played by imitation in the birth of desire. For example, we do not see
that jealousy and envy, like hatred, are scarcely more than traditional names given to internal
mediation, names which almost always conceal their true nature from us.
____________________
1. The author quotes from the French translation, L'Homme du Ressentiment . There is an
English translation by William H. Holdheim, Ressentiment ( New York: Free Press, 1960).
The word ressentiment is used by Scheler in the original German text as the most accurate
term for the feeling described. -
Chelle Bliss, Brenda Rothert