not be surprised if the look cast by M. de Rênal on
Valenod is vastly different from that raised by Don Quixote toward Amadis.
In Cervantes the mediator is enthroned in an inaccessible heaven and transmits to his faithful
follower a little of his serenity. In Stendhal, this same mediator has come down to earth. The
clear distinction between these two types of relationship between mediator and subject
indicates the enormous spiritual gap which separates Don Quixote from the most despicably
vain of Stendhal's characters. The image of the triangle cannot remain valid for us unless it at
once allows this distinction and measures this gap for us. To achieve this double objective,
we have only to vary the distance , in the triangle, separating the mediator from the desiring
subject.
Obviously this distance is greatest in Cervantes. There can be no contact whatsoever between
Don Quixote and his legendary Amadis. Emma Bovary is already closer to her Parisian
mediator. Travelers' tales, books, and the press bring the latest fashions of the capital even to
Yonville. Emma comes still closer to her mediator when she goes to the ball at the
Vaubyessards'; she penetrates the holy of holies and gazes at the idol face to face. But this
proximity is fleeting. Emma will never be able to desire that which the incarnations of her
"ideal" desire; she will never be able to be their rival; she will never leave for Paris.
Julien Sorel does all that Emma cannot do. At the beginning of The Red and the Black the distance between the hero and his mediator is as great as in Madame Bovary . But Julien spans
this distance; he leaves his province and becomes the lover of the proud Mathilde; he rises
rapidly to a brilliant position. Stendhal's other heroes are also close to their mediators. It is
this which distinguishes Stendhal's universe from those we have already considered. Between
Julien and Mathilde, between Rênal and Valenod, between Lucien Leuwen and the nobles of
Nancy, between Sansfin and the petty squires of Normandy, the distance is always small
enough to permit the rivalry of desires. In the novels of Cervantes and
-38-
Flaubert, the mediator remained beyond the universe of the hero; he is now within the same
universe.
Romantic works are, therefore, grouped into two fundamental categories -- but within these
categories there can be an infinite number of secondary distinctions. We shall speak of
external mediation when the distance is sufficient to eliminate any contact between the two
spheres of possibilities of which the mediator and the subject occupy the respective centers.
We shall speak of internal mediation when this same distance is sufficiently reduced to allow
these two spheres to penetrate each other more or less profoundly.
Obviously it is not physical space that measures the gap between mediator and the desiring
subject. Although geographical separation might be one factor, the distance between
mediator and subject is primarily spiritual. Don Quixote and Sancho are always close to each
other physically but the social and intellectual distance which separates them remains
insuperable. The valet never desires what his master desires. Sancho covets the food left by
the monks, the purse of gold found on the road, and other objects which Don Quixote
willingly lets him have. As for the imaginary island, it is from Don Quixote himself that
Sancho is counting on receiving it, as the faithful vassal holds everything in the name of his
lord. The mediation of Sancho is therefore an external mediation. No rivalry with the
mediator is possible. The harmony between the two companions is never seriously troubled.
The hero of external mediation proclaims aloud the true nature of his desire. He worships his
model openly and declares himself his disciple. We have seen Don Quixote himself explain
to Sancho the privileged part Amadis plays in his life. Mme. Bovary and Léon also admit the
truth about their