another unidentified man thrown in the same day? Of course not.
It doesnât have to be the same day. It takes time to get decomposed. In fact, it couldnâtâve been the same day.
How long you think it takes?
Days. Maybe two weeks. Badly decomposed, three. Thatâs when they threw Jackie in. Shot, took his clothes off, boom, in the water. Todayâs Thursday? Then three weeks today. Itâs him. So what are we going to do about it?
What do you mean? Nothing. Itâs done. Jackieâs dead. I knew about it. Now I read about it. I was only telling you, thinking maybe you knew and if you did, then who from? And if you didnât, that youâd probably be interested.
You mind my making an anonymous call to this paper so his wife could know?
Jackie not coming home for three weeks, she knows. So will everyone else in time.
How? Heâs unidentified and decomposed. And no clothes you say. Nothing at all?
Stripped clean. Wrist watch. Socks. Even his gold star.
I donât know why they didnât say nude in the newspaper, but all right. Did he also have no fingerprints on when you people threw him in?
I didnât throw anybody in. Neither do I know who did. I just know some people who know who did and why and how it went. Gambling debts. But in bad, and loans. Things like that. Worse. Taking on additional big debts with another group and not paying off the first one a dime before he did and then telling both groups to go eat it. Now if heâd just been in deep with the first people and told them to eat it, they wouldâve only broken his arm. But taking on two big debts way way over his head and telling them both to eat it and then going to another city to take on a third, well that was too much. The first two met and, with the thirdâs approval, decided to dump him. As for your fingerprints, I guess not. Why bother, for theyâd also have to kick out all his teeth and fill in his chin cleft and scars. Besides, they didnât want to make it impossible for him to be identified.
Then youâll have to explain to me. Why only take off his clothes and in other words only go halfway with his unidentification when they know Jackie has a record and will eventually be identified? Time to give them a cover or get the people who did it away?
No. They thought itâd be a good lesson to whoever might think he can beat out on two big debts to two vaguely related groups and to tell them both to go eat it besides.
But how these people who are supposed to get the lesson supposed to find out itâs a lesson and then one meant for them? By reading of an unidentified decomposed man found floating in the bay who couldâve gotten there through some long sleepwalk? How did the groups even know it was going to make the paper, nothing as the article was. And if they did, that itâd even be read?
Whisper and word got passed around starting a month ago. Jackieâs betting. Jackieâs welshing. Jackieâs in very steep. Jackie wonât cough up a note for them and told both of them to eat it raw. Jackie could get a leg broke talking and acting that way. If anyoneâs a pal of Jackieâs, give him the word? Jackieâs missing. Hey, anybody see Jackie or hear from him the last few days? Then, body found. Man. Hmm, bay you say? Tomorrow or the next day weâll read heâd been shot with a small-caliber bullet so close and clean that it almost got lost behind the back hairs of his head. Everybody will know who it is and what for. As for the newspaper, thatâs not the important thing. If it didnât get in, someone would phone them. Whatâs more important is that the people this lessonâs directed to get to know it slow.
These groups never seemed that clever to me to plan it so smooth.
Listen, weâre no psychologists and know little about the subject, but in what these groups do and their customers, they are. They havenât studied it but