Free The Devil's Details by Chuck Zerby

Notes
Chapter 1
    1. See M. H. Dodds, “
Footnotes
,” Notes and Queries , 19 October 1910. I have not located the actual footnote volume of the Reverend Hodgson.
    2. Mark Amory, ed.,
The Letters of Evelyn Waugh
(New Haven, Conn.: Ticknor & Fields, 1980), p. 573.
    3. Daniel Bell,
The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting
(New York: Basic Books, 1973), p. 349.
    4. William James,
The Principles of Psychology
(Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952), p. 7.
    5. H. J. Paton,
The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy
(New York: Harper & Row, 1967), p. 69.
    6. Edmund Lodge, Esq., K.H., Norroy King of Arms, F.S.A.,
Illustrations of British History, Biography, and Manners, in the Reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary, Elizabeth, & James I, exhibited in a series of Original Papers, selected from the Mss., of the Noble Families of Howard, Talbot, and Cecil; containing among a variety of interesting pieces, a great part of the correspondence of Elizabeth and Her Ministers with George Sixth Earl of Shrewsbury, during the fifteen years in which Mary Queen of Scots, remained in his custody
(London: John Chidley, 1837), p. 316.
    7. Ibid.
    8. Ibid.
    9. G. W. F. Hegel,
Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art
, trans. T. M. Knox (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), p. 12.
    10. Daniel Bell,
The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting
(New York: Basic Books, 1973), p. 36.
    11. Clarence J. Karier, “
John Dewey and the New Liberalism: Some Reflections and Responses
,” History of Education Quarterly , winter 1957, p. 442. See also Charles L. Zerby, “
John Dewey and the Polish Question: A Response to the Revisionist Historians
,” History of Education Quarterly , pp. 17-30.
    12. Thomas McFarland, “
Who Was Benjamin Whichcote? or, The Myth of Annotation
,” in Annotation and Its Texts , ed. Stephen A. Barney (Oxford, New York, and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 160.
    13. Ibid., p. 161.
    14. Ibid., p. 160.
    15. Ibid., p. 163.
    16. Ibid., p. 164.
    17. Ibid.
    18. Ibid., p. 170.
    19. Ibid., p. 164.
    20. Ibid., p. 177.
    21. Ibid.
    22. See ibid., p. 162.
    23. Ibid., p. 156.
    24. Anthony Grafton,
The Footnote: A Curious History
(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 5.
    25. Ibid.
    26. Ibid., p. 6.
    27. Ibid., pp. 7-8.
    28. Ibid., p. 111.
    29. Ibid., p. 56.
    30. Ibid., p. 114.
    31. Ibid., p. 70. Grafton indicated that three other scholars have used the quip; it can be assumed that many more have passed it along to their doctoral candidates who, scared and lonely as they often are, do not trust any footnote; one can always go wrong and become a dark and menacing stalker, one who doesn’t bother to ring the doorbell but clambers into the study through any handy window or by way of a cellar door.
    32. Vincent Tomas, “
The Modernity of Jonathan Edwards
,” The New England Quarterly , 10 March 1952, p. 76.
Chapter 2
    1. Gamini Salgado,
The Elizabethan Underworld
(New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992), p. 11. The narrow focus on criminal life in Salgado’s delightful book does not prevent it from giving us a broad and amusing sense of London life.
    2. Ibid., p. 7.
    3. For a succinct account of Richard Jugge’s life, see Colin Clair,
A History of Printing in Britain
(London: Cassell, 1965), pp. 69-72. References in this book will always give actual page numbers. The term passim will not be used to indicate “and pages following.” What might seem merely convenient shorthand often conceals information—that is, the amount of attention given to a subject, a fact a reader might need in order to decide whether or not to hunt down the reference.
    4.
Domestic State Papers. Elizabeth
. vol. XLVIII, 6, in Colin Clair,
A History of Printing in Britain
(London: Cassell, 1965), p. 71.
    5.
R. W. Scribner
,
For the Sake of Simple Folk: Popular Propaganda for the German Reformation
(Cambridge, London, New York,