head and said, âIt cairnât be, it cairnâtbe.â Another farmhand sat through a programme composed of literary quotations and said, âThose are the items we folks like.â Boarâs face was âalive with mingled pride and enthusiasm as he fondle[d] the television set with all the love which a stockman gives to a new-born calf or a leggy foalâ. Television, he said, was the only way of âtaking part in the exciting life of Londonâ, which he had never seen. Had he lived three centuries ago, the magazine reflected, âhe would have been burned at the stake as a wizard or a sorcerer in good East Anglian style. But because he lives in the year 1939 he is looked upon for miles around as a fairy godfather who performs miracles.â 59
The BBC was starting to flesh out the habits and rituals of this new tribe, the viewers, nearly 900 of whom were already writing regularly to Alexandra Palace about the programmes they had seen. In February and March 1939, the announcers Jasmine Bligh and Elizabeth Cowell asked viewers to apply to fill in a questionnaire, and over 4,000 â a huge proportion out of about 20,000 set owners â returned them. The survey revealed that viewers loved the announcers; they found extraneous noises of scene-shifting irritating; they thought continental films, operettas and ballets were boring; and they wanted a âChildrenâs Hourâ as on the radio. They mostly disliked items being repeated, although some viewers welcomed this because television was so addictive: âWe look forward to a repeat of a programme we have already seen, so that we can go out for a walk now and again.â 60
One June afternoon in 1939, seventy-five couples, chosen by ballot from the 700 who had applied, attended a âtelevision tea partyâ at Broadcasting House. Televisionâs stars â Joan Miller, Jasmine Bligh, Elizabeth Cowell and Leslie Mitchell â wore âstop me and ask oneâ identity buttons affixed to their coat lapels and handed out smoked salmon sandwiches, cakes and buns. Sitting in the raked, padded seats of the hall, the viewers plied Gerald Cock with questions. âWhy,â asked a man at the back, âcanât the eveningâs programme be given on the screen to save me looking it up in the
Radio Times
?â This was a matter for the engineers, replied Cock. âWhy is it that the television orchestra so often drowns the soloists?â Cramped studio space, came the answer. âWhy canât the morning demonstration film be changed?âBecause it cost £3,000 to make, Cock said. When he mentioned
Picture Page
, spontaneous applause filled the hall. 61
âOf course
Picture Page
is our favourite,â said one woman to Grace Wyndham Goldie, attending for the
Listener
. âAnd the plays. I do like the plays. Except the Insect Play. I didnât understand what that was all about. And I donât like the foreign films they put on sometimes. But the restâs splendid. Itâs all so friendly.â Goldie noted the enormous popularity of the announcers who also doubled up as interviewers and stunt people, having their palms read by chirologists or being rescued from burning buildings in fire displays. As the admiration for the announcers attested, television was already more informal than radio. Radio conversation at this time was often scripted, and Hilda Matheson, the BBCâs director of talks, complained that many speakers read their scripts in a âparsonical droneâ. On television, by contrast, the announcers could not read from a script if they wanted to look at the viewer, and could not see much in the glare of the lights anyway, so they had to learn to be natural. Televisionâs stars, reflected Goldie, would be âthe people who make direct contact with its small audiences. In other words, they will be the talkers not the actors, the Howard Marshalls not the Clark