faces or architectural features from memory in the leather-bound sketchbook that he had brought with him.
Of the two special constables, Gabriel liked Daniel more. MartÃn was taciturn and morose and gave the impression that he regarded a scribe who had never borne arms as a burden to be carried rather than an asset to the group. Daniel was more cheerful. One afternoon when they were out gathering firewood together, he explained that MartÃn had a wife and child in Valladolid and didnât want to spend a long time away from them.
âMe, Iâm happy to be away,â Daniel said. âJust as long as I get back by next summer.â
âWhy next summer?â
âIâm getting married,
chico
. Settling down. Iâm going to work on my wifeâs parentsâ farm. Iâve had enough of bad food and officers screaming in my face. And Iâd rather ride a good woman by night than a bad horse by day, if you know what I mean?â
Gabriel did not, but he sensed that he should. All this manly talk made him conscious of his own inexperience and bookishness and filled him with a determination to show his companions that he was more than a scribe. He saddled and unsaddled mules and horses. He gathered firewood and learned how to strike two flints and make a fire himself. He also tried out his companionsâ weapons. Almost every evening he persuaded one of them to give him basic instructions in fencing positions and technique. Neckerâs zweihänder was too heavy and unwieldy. Gabriel preferred Danielâs short cinquedea with its thick base almost as wide as a hand tapering off to a sharp point, his guardianâs side sword with its bluish tempered steel or Venturaâs basilard parrying dagger and swept-hilt Italian rapier with its S-shaped guard, its silver pommel and leather grip and the Latin words
Usque mors
ââUntil deathââwhich Ventura had had engraved in the blade just above the guard.
With these weapons Gabriel learned how to position his feet, to thrust,lunge and parry and to gauge distance and anticipate his opponentâs movements. He also learned about the different schools of fencing. Ventura talked about Euclidâs theories of geometry, about the relative importance of obtuse and right angles in the meeting of the blades, about the exact distance of each step and the positioning of the feet for a thrust and lunge, about maintaining distance through circular movement within the same sphere and the importance of maintaining the same parallel distance between the rapier and parrying dagger.
Ventura used Italian as well as Spanish expressions to describe particular movements and strikes. He talked of the
mediotajo
âthe cut from the elbowâthe
stramazzone
âthe flip of the pointâand the
stoccataâ
the thrust delivered under the opponentâs sword with a turning of the wrist. Necker had learned his sword fighting in the Holy Roman emperorâs mercenary Landsknecht and was not impressed by Venturaâs intellectual approach. He often made disparaging remarks about the lighter blade that Ventura used and his enthusiasm for the new Italian methods, and Ventura teased him that his own sword was good for sacking Rome but not much else. One evening as they were setting up camp in an open field where Mendoza said that Numancia might once have stood, Ventura playfully insisted that the Passau wolf on Neckerâs two-hander was a fake and annoyed him so much that the German challenged him to a mock duel.
Mendoza agreed, on condition that there was no blood or physical contact. For more than half an hour, the two men fought in the open air, and Ventura eventually won the argument, as he effortlessly parried and evaded the big Germanâs slashing attacks before finally dropping onto one knee to deliver what would have been a killing blow. As Gabriel watched them fight and listened to the clash of their swords, he thought of the
Eric Flint, Charles E. Gannon