cellar bakery conditions was hard to separate from larger anxieties about the habits of the nationâs new Jewish and Italian immigrants. Thus, even when Perkins and other witnesses defended workersâ hygiene habits, the commission voiced skepticism. In one revealing exchange, state assemblyman Cyrus Phillips argued with a public health doctor. âThese men you have described are naturally and inherently unclean; arenât they? And they donât know how to do anything else?â the assemblyman queried. âWhy, I guess thatâs true,â the doctor ventured cautiously, but the assemblyman pressed on with his point about the nature of immigrant bakers: âNo amount of inspection will improve them very much?â Then the doctor surprised those present in the hearing by responding that yes, he did believe that bakersâ habits
could
be changed. Assemblyman Phillips replied incredulously, â[You think] that they could counteract their natural and inherent tendencies?â âI certainly do,â the doctor repeated. The two officials werenât talking about bread anymore, they were debating the nature of new immigrants. Sensationalist accounts of dangerous bread likely reflected unease about newcomers more than any real hazards posed by eating the product of their ovens. And this is, in the end, the grain of salt with which we must take fears of cellar bakeriesâand a clue to why bakeries like the Wardsâ flourished.
Whether or not bread from small bakeries was actually unsanitary, the moral panic around dirt, germs, and immigrant habits was a gift for industrial bakers. âI want to know where my bread comes from!â an affluent woman demanded in a national advertising campaign for Holsum bread. âI donât want bread from some nameless basement bakery. I want my bread from a bakery thatâs clean as my own kitchen. ⦠Iâve stopped baking but I still want clean bread.â Or, as an ad from Los Angeles more bluntly put it, âMany bakeries in New York, Chicago, and other cities are being condemned by health officers as unclean and unsanitary. How often do you inspect
your
bakery?â 39 Strange as it might seem to contemporary foodies, in the early twentieth century the language of âknowing where your food comes fromâ was a public relations coup for industrial food.
Bakeries across the country overwhelmingly adopted the new language of clean bread in their advertising, but it was the Wards, once again, who set the bar. Alongside reprinted news reports on the âshocking state of cellar bakeries,â the Wards invited New York to visit its bakeries. âYou can see every detail in the making of Wardâs Tip-Top Bread. The human hand never touches bread at these, the greatest bakeries in the worldâdaylight bakeries, snow-white temples of cleanliness.â Transparency, cleanliness, and modernity displaced taste, cost, convenience, and even freshness in bread advertising. The âbare handâ became the greatest enemy of bread. As a Ward Bakeries ad in the
New York Times
stressed in italics,
âBread kneaded by hand or mixed by hand can never be made a truly clean sanitary product.â
40 Of course, even bread âuntouched by human handsâ still required the presence of a few workers, and this bothered consumers bombarded by images of disease-ridden bakers. So the Wardsâ advertising also trumpeted the companyâs meticulous inspection of workersâ health and habitsâeven their moral character.
Consumers around the country flocked to witness the spectacle of sanitary baking. They crowded around the glass of smaller âwindow bakeries,â where all operations could be viewed from the street, and lined up for tours of larger factories. One Ohio bakery even encouraged teachers to plan hygiene lessons for their students around tours of its factory. A trip to Stolzenbachâs scientific