âYouâre clear on what the bill does?â
Governor: âSeems pretty clear. Why does some lab have to employ somebody from in-state to be valid here? Thatâs stupid. Are there any arguments for it?â
Maybe somebody would offer an argument. Sometimes a staffer would mention that some lawmaker was really keen ongetting a bill through or some other practical matter of expedience. It didnât matter who the lawmaker was or how powerful he or she was; the bossâs response would be some variation on a repetitive theme: âAgain, in case you havenât noticed, I donât care whether some senator likes a bill or not. This is just another stupid mandate pushed by lobbyists for their own mercenary reasons. The technicians want more business, so they hired a lobbyist to get a bill passed that forces dentists to use them instead of someone in another state. Thatâs stupid. Veto. Next.â
âUh-hut!â Thatâd be Diane. Rat meetings were always punctuated by her laugh: âUh-hut!â
Another staffer: âNext bill is S-three-four-eight. Shawnâs Law. I think weâre all pretty familiar with this one. Some changes from last yearâs bill, but basically the same idea. It would make it illegal for children under age sixteen to operate ATVs without supervision, and it would require fifteen-year-olds to pass a safety course before using them with adult accompaniment. As I say, this yearâs version isnât that different. My main concern here is enforcement. Weâd be passing a law thatâ.â
âExactly.â The governor grasped the point of this one without much explanation. âWhat are you gonna do, post DNR agents all over the state and tell âem to watch out for kids riding ATVs? This is a joke.â
âUh-hut!â
Staffer: âThereâs also the issue of this safety course. Itâs not clear howâ.â
âWhoâs going to run that? And what are you going todo to a kid who rides one on private property? Stop him and make him take out his safety course certificate? This is a joke. Veto.â
âUh-hut!â
----
The governor had five calendar days, excluding Sundays, to sign or veto a bill. At some point during those five days, particularly if the bill was a big deal, we might have what Nat called a fire drill. Fire drills happened when a hard deadline approachedâa press conference or, as in this case, a ratification deadlineâand suddenly the governorâs attention became completely fixed on a single task. Maybe he and his family were going out of town that weekend and it had to be done before he left. Suddenly heâd want to discuss every conceivable argument and think through every piece of relevant data. Heâd scribble on a notepad and shout questions at whoever was standing nearby. The questions usually had to do with some past veto or policy position, and generally only Stewart knew the answers.
âThere was a bill in like 2004, something to do with eyesores on private property. Did we sign it or veto it?â
âI donât knowâ would be the answer.
âGet Stewart in here.â
That person would run off to find Stewart. Then the governor would shout to the scheduling office, just outside his door, âHey, Lewis!â Lewis would come in and the governor would ask where Stewart was. Lewis, who hadnât heard himask for Stewart the first time, would run off to find him. This would happen four or five times in quick succession. If Stewart was at his desk or outside smoking, it wasnât a problem. If he was elsewhere, weâd see a train of young people walking through the governorâs wing of the State House and in the menâs room off the rotunda asking if anybody had seen Stewart. Finally Stewart would be rounded up, and heâd answer the governorâs question. Then the governor would think of another question, and this one Stewart