or anything like it happen?â
âNo.â
He didnât bother prompting me for the notebook this time.
âYour loving brother-in-law says that when he was on furlough, you invited him and his wife Ruth over for dinner, and that a woman named Natalie Ash was there.â
âNo.â
âThat the purpose was to introduce the Ash woman to Greenglass so she could go southwest to play courier with atomic secrets.â
His mouth tightened and so did his eyes. âI know her, sheâs a neighbor ⦠but no such thing happened.â
I leaned forward again, holding his gaze. âDo you remember what really happened, the night Greenglass claims your wife typed up atomic secrets and you cut up a Jell-O box to make a two-piece jigsaw puzzle out of it?â
A full shrug this time. âJust idle conversation. The war effort. That the Russians were carrying a heavy load, and we should have a second front. Nothing treasonous, or conspiratorial either for that matter.â
I asked, âWhat about this Gold character? Do you know him?â
âI never met him in my life.â
âWhat about this woman Elizabeth Bentley, who says she had calls from you?â
His nostrils flared. âThe professional ex-Red? She said she had calls from someone named Julius. Iâm not the only one with that name, starting with Caesar. But my understanding is that these spies use code names. So if she did talk to a âJulius,â it was someone else.â
âYou didnât know her.â
âI donât know her.â
âAnd your codefendant, Morton Sobell?â
âHe was at City College, an acquaintance. I bumped into him years later. Purely social and not much of that.â
âThere was a witness who claimed Sobell turned over some film to you.â
âNever happened. But what film? This witness, Max Elitcher, was a friend of ours going back to City College days. First, Saypol and Cohn put the fear of God into him ⦠then they put words in his mouth.â He shook his head. âOn this, Sobell gets thirty years? Incredible.â
I finished my notes on that, then went back to the main point.
I asked, âDid your brother-in-law, on either of his two furloughs, come to your apartment and deliver to youâat your request or otherwiseâinformation about an atom bomb?â
âCertainly not.â
âWhat about a sketch of a cross section of the atom bomb?â
âNo.â A deep dismissive laugh came up and out from his chest. âEven if Dave had been capable of such.â
âWhy do you say that?â
Rosenberg smirked. âHeâs a machinist with a high school education. Itâs laughable to think that he would even know what he was looking atâmuch less memorize the âsecretâ and carry it home in his head.â
I held his eyes; they didnât waver. âWhat about the claim that your wife typed up notes David brought to you?â
âShe did no such thing.â
â Can she type?â
âCertainly. She was a clerk, a secretary, when we met. But she didnât type any such material.â He shifted in his seat. âMr. Heller, Ruth claims her husbandâs handwriting is illegible, and thatâs why Ethel was enlisted to type from it, since only his sister could decipher it. But Ethel says her brother has excellent handwriting.â
I frowned. âI donât remember seeing where your attorney introduced samples of Davidâs handwriting into evidence.â
His eyes widened a little. âHe didnât. Should he have?â
Underlining something in my notebook, I said, âWell. Letâs just say Iâll be looking for samples. My understanding isâafter the warâthat you and David went into business together, and that he left that business, a machine shop, under a cloud.â
He tilted his head. âThere was a strain. David felt I owed him