practices of these firms, who understand the technology. âMachines were put in place with no sampling to make sure they were âin controlâ and no comparison studies,â she explained. âThe code of the machines is not public knowledge, and none of these machines has since been impounded.â In these circumstances, she continued, itâs possible to manipulate both the count and the proportions of votes.
In the bad old days of Tammany Hall, she pointed out, you had to break the counter pins on the lever machines, and if there was any vigilance in an investigation, the broken pins would automaticallyincriminate the machine. With touch-screen technology, the crudeness and predictability of the old ward-heeler racketeers isnât the question anymore. But had there been a biased âsettingâ on the new machines it could be uncoveredâif a few of them could be impounded. The Ohio courts are currently refusing all motions to put the stateâs voting machines, punch-card or touch-screen, in the public domain. Itâs not clear to me, or to anyone else, who is tending the machines in the meanwhile. . . .
I asked her, finally, what would be the logical grounds for deducing that any tampering had in fact occurred. âWell, I understand from what I have read,â she said, âthat the early exit polls on the day were believed by both parties.â That, I was able to tell her from direct experience, was indeed true. But it wasnât quite enough, either. So I asked, âWhat if all the anomalies and malfunctions, to give them a neutral name, were distributed along one axis of consistency: in other words, that they kept on disadvantaging only one candidate?â My question was hypothetical, as she had made no particular study of Ohio, but she replied at once: âThen that would be quite serious.â
I am not any sort of statistician or technologist, and (like many Democrats in private) I did not think that John Kerry should have been president of any country at any time. But I have been reviewing books on history and politics all my life, making notes in the margin when I come across a wrong date, or any other factual blunder, or a missing point in the evidence. No book is ever free from this. But if all the mistakes and omissions occur in such a way as to be consistent, to support or attack only one position, then you give the author a lousy review. The Federal Election Commission, which has been a risible body for far too long, ought to make Ohio its business. The Diebold company, which also manufactures ATMs, should not receive another dime until it can produce a voting system that is similarly reliable. And Americans should cease to be treated like serfs or extras when they present themselves to exercise their franchise.
( Vanity Fair , March 2005)
On Becoming American
A S WE WERE waiting for the cameras to roll in a Washington studio just before Christmas, my faux bonhomme host, Pat Buchanan, inquired offhandedly as to my citizenship and residency status. I innocently told him that my paperwork for naturalization was in the system, but that Homeland Security had racked up an immense backlog of applications. Then up came the music for the next segmentâwhich was to be about the display of religious symbols on public landâand before I knew it, Buchanan was demanding to know by what right I, a foreign atheist, could presume to come over here and lecture Americans about their Christian heritage.
Synthetic outrage is de rigueur in the world of American cable-TV news, and I was almost as surprised by the authenticity of my own fury as I had been by the extreme inexpensiveness of Buchananâs ambush. More than two decades in Washingtonâand all that time beseeched by Buchanan to be a guest! Three children born in the country, and all three as American as the day is long! An unblemished record of compliance with boring correspondence from the