at the height of Vietnam. Godwinâs resigned, Weinbergerâs own procurement chief, because Defense has no noticeable commitment to controlling spending.
âNow, you tell me you have fifteen ships in the Gulf. Thatâs horseshit. My count is twenty-five, with the Forrestal battle group, and if you include everything, minesweeps, auxiliaries, survey shipsâthirty-eight. I estimate our effort here is running almost a million dollars a day in above-normal costs. That doesnât include losses. Maintaining a carrier in the Indian Ocean is straining our entire defense posture. Itâs showing in retention, upkeep, and manning. And all at a time when Congress is desperate to cut expenses. Iâm sure youâve heard of Gramm-Rudman, Admiral?â
Hart said in a fatherly tone, âThese forces pay for themselves. If the Iranians were ever able to close the Straitsââ
âPlease let me continue. Point two. Several people in the Association for a Rational Defense have told me the Gulf proves weâve built the wrong kind of navy. Weâre top-heavy in carriers and expensive cruisers, leading-edge technology, but when we had to sweep mines, you came to us hat in hand and said you had to mobilize the reserves. That made people very angry on the Hill, Admiral. We mean to modify the Defense Five-Year Plan to reflect this sort of oversight.â
Hart was turning red now. He tried to interrupt again, but she kept on, her voice calm but insistent, hammering fact after fact into the smoky air. âPoint three. The Western Europeans are increasingly concerned about what youâre doing out here. The recent defense ministersâ meeting at the Hagueâwell, Iâm sure you read your press summary. They donât understand why we have such large forces here when, as you say, the opponents are fanatics in speedboats. Theyâre afraid weâre going to engage Iran for reasons of our own. Theyâre supporting us so far, but every new incident makes them more nervous. The French and the Dutch are especially wary. Theyâre not beyond pulling out their forces and letting us go it alone.
âPoint four. The Gulf states arenât âhappy,â theyâre desperate. They all have large Shiâite minorities and any hint of crusading encourages revolt. They have to live here after weâve gone home. Theyâre worried about trading relationships, about the attacks on their oil platforms, and they wonder every day whether Hormuz is going to be closed.
âNow letâs get to what concerns me, gentlemen. Thatâs what the Iranians are going to do. The warâs stalemated in the north. It has to be settled, but without Khomeiniâs having to tell millions of bereaved families their sons died for nothing.
âHis strategy may be to expand the war southward, into the Gulf. If it succeeds there, Iranâs a geopolitical winner. If it fails, if the major powers step in and force peace, it can be presented as a dictated armistice, a stab in the back by the Great Satan. The way the Pasdaran are being used is consistent with this. Theyâre perceived as out of control, but the chaos they cause plays right into Iranâs long-range plans.
âNow, the last point I want to make. And probably the most important.â She got up, drawing their eyes with her, feeling now their hostility, and crossed to the far wall. It held a huge map of Southwest Asia. Her finger swept past the blue writhe of the Gulf, inland, to the northeast.
âYou act as if Iran were our enemy. Thatâs the short view, gentlemen. Beyond Shiâa fundamentalism is still the Soviet Union.
âThere are twenty-five divisions in the Transcaucasus and Turkestan military districts. Twelve of them are armored or mechanized. Theyâre seven hundred miles from the Gulf. There are four more, battle-hardened and highly mobile, in Afghanistan. The Soviets can drive across Iran