Free Donor by Ken McClure

He was a doctor; it was assumed he’d be returning to medicine in civvy street. Luckily, he had confided in a fellow officer that he had no wish to continue in medicine, for a while at least. This had led to a suggestion through a friend of a friend that he might be suitable for a job with the Sci-Med Inspectorate. Now, after four years with Sci-Med he felt settled and content.
    No two assignments were ever the same; each was demanding in its own way and, being concerned exclusively with problem areas in medicine, he was obliged to keep abreast of the latest advances in his profession. His readiness to move to assignments at a moment’s notice was part of the job, wherever they happened to be in the UK.
    The only real drawback to his lifestyle was that he was seldom in one place long enough to establish relationships. At thirty-five he was still unmarried.
    Dunbar flipped open the slim file on Amy Teasdale. She had suffered almost continual renal problems from birth. Various treatments had been tried in a variety of hospitals while she waited for a suitable organ to become available, but her condition had deteriorated until, after a period of particularly severe illness, she was admitted to Médic Ecosse. The team there managed to stabilize her long enough for a suitable donor organ to be found.
    Unfortunately the story had not had a happy ending. Amy’s body had rejected the organ almost immediately, despite the computerized match being good in terms of tissue compatibility. A copy of the Médic Ecosse comparator sheet was included. Cause of death was given as severe immune response to the presence of foreign tissue, despite satisfactory in vitro compatibility. As the compatibility rating of the donor organ was given as 84 per cent, Dunbar thought Staff Nurse Fairfax’s complaint that Amy had been given the wrong organ did not sound too convincing.
    He turned to the file on Lisa Fairfax herself. In view of what had gone before, it was possible that the nurse’s claim might have stemmed from her having been deeply fond of young Amy Teasdale and correspondingly upset by her death – always an occupational hazard for staff in children’s wards. She obviously believed that the immunological reaction she had witnessed in her young charge had been caused by the child receiving an incompatible organ, but her reaction could have been inspired by grief and the inherent need to explain away an emotionally unacceptable happening.
    Despite assurances from the hospital authorities that there had been no mix-up and that Amy had received an entirely compatible kidney, as shown by lab analysis, Lisa Fairfax had persisted in her claims and she and the hospital had parted company. It looked like a classic case of a nurse allowing herself to become too involved with her patient, thought Dunbar.
    He closed the file. It seemed straightforward on paper, although the question of why Staff Nurse Fairfax had persisted with her allegations until Sci-Med became aware of them puzzled him. People did tend to make wild claims and accusations when they were deeply upset, but after a period they usually recovered and, in many cases, were embarrassed about things they had said under stress. Maybe he should arrange a meeting with her, to see if there was more to her than had come through in the report.
    He looked to see if there was any more about her and found a one-page personnel file. It included her address and some background material, including the fact that she had worked for three years as a theatre nurse and for a further three specializing in transplant patient care. This made Dunbar think again. He had been ready to dismiss her as emotionally vulnerable, but perhaps he was wrong. You accumulated a lot of nursing experience in six years. Lisa Fairfax must have seen a lot of transplant patients come and go in that time. He decided that, in fairness, he would definitely have to arrange a meeting.
    The file on Sheila Barnes’s complaint was