Free The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality by John Hamer

in the 1930s that demonstrates an uncannily accurate depiction of a future society of oppressed masses in a similar vein to Orwell’s ‘1984’.   Another grandson was Julian Huxley, famous as the first secretary-general of UNESCO, a branch of the Elite-controlled United Nations.   Coincidence?   I shall let the reader draw his/her own conclusions.  

    Already I can almost hear the calls for me to be burned at the stake for daring to question the great religion of evolution – for that is what it has become to so many people.   I do not suggest for one moment that localised evolving of bodily features and functions of certain creatures (micro-evolution) does not take place over millennia in order to adapt to surroundings and for example, fine-tuning defences against predators.   To suggest that, would be just as absurd.   However, to believe that whole new species are created from others or from virtually nothing (macro-evolution) when the abundant, contrary evidence is examined seems too far-fetched and unscientific to be anything but an elaborate hoax and a deliberate deception, perpetuated by wholesale propaganda.

    “The known fossil record fails to document a single example of evolution accomplishing a major transition - every palaeontologist knows that most species don’t change.” Stephen Gould, evolutionary biologist, Harvard University 1980.

    "I am not satisfied that Darwin proved his point or that his influence in scientific and public thinking has been beneficial.   The success of Darwinism was accomplished by a decline in scientific integrity."   W.R. Thompson, Canadian scientist.

    "…as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed.   Why do we not find them embedded in the crust of the earth?   Why is not all nature in a confusion of halfway species instead of being, as we see them, well-defined species?"   Charles Darwin.

    Darwin’s own answer to this particular question was that there had been insufficient time since his theory was espoused to thoroughly check the available fossil records.   Interesting hypothesis yes, but now proven to be totally incorrect.   We have now had almost another 150 years since the death of Darwin to rectify this inconvenient fact, but evolutionary ‘science’ is no further forward in this respect than it was in the 1860s.

    "Just as pre-Darwinian biology was carried out by people whose faith was in the Creator and His plan, post-Darwinian biology is being carried out by people whose faith is in, almost, the deity of Darwin.   They've seen their task as to elaborate his theory and to fill the gaps in it, to fill the trunk and twigs of the tree.   But it seems to me that the theoretical framework has very little impact on the actual progress of the work in biological research.   In a way some aspects of Darwinism and of neo-Darwinism seem to me to have held back the progress of science."   Colin Patterson, senior palaeontologist, the Museum of Natural History, London.

    “Not many scientists are willing to risk their livelihood to point out the facts. They remain mute, mouthing the party line when necessary in order to keep their positions. Those illogical arguments mouthed by the scientists then fuel misunderstanding among those who are unable to double-check the truth and logic behind the theory of evolution.”    Duncan Long.

    And, remarkably...

    “Not one change of species into another is on record.   We cannot prove that a single species has changed into another.”   Charles Darwin, ‘My Life and Letters’, Vol. 1, page 210.

    That contemporary, great champion of evolutionary myth and dogma, Professor Richard Dawkins, latterly of the Elite-funded and controlled, great educational propaganda machine, Oxford University and author of ‘The Selfish Gene’ and ‘The God Delusion’, wastes no time in denouncing, belittling and even insulting anyone who dares question the great pseudo-religion of evolution.   Why would