Free The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality by John Hamer Page A

this be?   Why is it such a crime or heresy to question or debate widely-held scientific beliefs?   Is Dawkins an evolutionist per se or simply anti-religion, choosing evolution as the only viable alternative?   This of course is the classic Hegelian trap.   Present two options to choose from, neither of them correct, whilst encouraging the masses to pick their favourite and debate the pros and cons until we lose sight of the real issue.   We should ask why the mainstream media even allows Dawkins a platform for his mostly disingenuous tirades, whilst denying it to those who espouse the contrary view in a more considered, rational or scientific way.   Dawkins’ ironically, somewhat evangelical–type arguments have brought him largely unreported ridicule from many quarters with even the hard-line Darwinian, Michael Ruse suggesting that Dawkins’ rants make him feel “embarrassed to be an atheist”.  

    “When you find issues/controversies which people love to debate endlessly, which are emotionally inflammatory and which divide the masses into oppositional stances/groups, it is a pretty strong possibility that the controlling elites might be busy behind the scenes, fomenting these quarrels and keeping them alive.”   kennysideshow.blogspot.com 15th November 2011

    Could Dawkins, knowingly or un-knowingly be a puppet of the Elite, a so-called ‘shill’ or ‘useful idiot’ who is discreetly encouraged to spread his dis-information to as wide an audience as possible?   If so, he certainly would not be the first nor the last, one suspects.

    Richard Milton was initially an ardent believer in Darwinian doctrine until he began to investigate the myths and legends of evolutionary theory in depth.   After 20 years of studying and writing about evolution, he realised that there were many anomalous elements in the theory.   He therefore decided to put every main classic ‘proof’ of Darwinism to the test.   His results left him stunned at first.   He found that the theory could not even stand up to the rigours of even rudimentary investigative journalism.   Eventually, he published a book titled “The Facts of Life: Shattering the Myths of Darwinism”.

    “I experienced the witch-hunting activity of the Darwinist police at first hand – it was deeply disappointing to find myself being described by the prominent Oxford zoologist, Richard Dawkins, as ‘loony’, ‘stupid’ and ‘in need of psychiatric help’ in response to purely scientific reporting.”   Richard Milton
     
    Do we detect shades of the Soviet Union in the 20th century, when so-called dissident scientists there began speaking out against the diktats and manufactured reality of Stalin’s regime?

    If all the preceding assertions are true, this all begs the question, ‘what is the point of the deception’?   If someone goes to all that trouble to make sure we believe something that is not and cannot be proven, there must be a reason for it and a hidden agenda behind it.   Indeed, this simple test can be applied to anything but in this case the overwhelmingly obvious conclusion is that it is done in order to deceive and therefore impose and maintain control by taking advantage of the lack of knowledge of the real truth of our origins and purpose as a species.

    Fossil records constitute the primary source for the evolutionists in searching for evidence for the theory of evolution.   The fossil records certainly contain the remains of past human beings but when these are examined objectively, it may be seen that the records themselves are in no way in favour of evolutionary theory, but rather against it, contrary to the assertions of the evolutionists.   However, since these fossils are incorrectly portrayed by the evolutionists and presented for public opinion with the intent of fulfilling pre-conceived ideas; many people are fooled into incorrectly believing that the fossil records actually verify the theory of evolution.

    The