Houston?â Byrnes asked.
âWell, I donât know.â
âWhat
do
you know about him?â
âNot much. Not yet.â
âFind out. And soon.â
âDid he leave a will?â Hawes asked.
âLeft everything he had to the kids.â
âWhich was what?â
âBupkes,â
Meyer said.
âWhatâs that?â Parker asked.
âRabbit shit.â
âSo then whatâs this
something
somebody wanted bad enough to kill for?â
âThe MacGuffin,â Hawes said.
âI told you,â Willis said. âItâs a fuckin movie.â
âMovie, my ass,â Byrnes said. âGet some composites made from the witnesses in that pizza joint. Letâs at least find two guys who came in blazing in broad daylight, can we? And find out where that poker game took place. There has to be â¦â
âOn Lewiston,â Carella said. âUp in the â¦â
â
Where
on Lewiston? Our manâs leaving
town
tomorrow.â
The room went silent.
âI want you to treat this like a single case with Danny as the connecting link,â Byrnes said. âOne of the guys in that poker game
knew
Danny, and another one may have killed Hale. Letâs find out who was
in
the damn game. And find out who that old man really
was
. He didnât exist in a vacuum. Nobody does. If he had something somebody wanted, find out what the hell it was. If it was just the insurance policy, then stay with the Keatings till you nail them. I want the four of you who caught the squeals to work this as a team. Split the legwork however you like. But
bring
me something.â
Carella nodded.
âMeyer?â
âYeah.â
âArtie? Bert?â
âWe hear you.â
âThen do it,â Byrnes said.
âWhat about my dope bust?â Parker asked.
âStay,â Byrnes said, as if he were talking to a pit bull.
There were several training exercises at the academy, each designed to illustrate the unreliability of eye witnesses. Each of them involved a variation on the same theme. During a class lecture, someone would come into the room, interrupting the class, and then go out again. The cops-in-training would later be asked to describe the person whoâd entered and departed. In one exercise, the intruder was merely someone who went to one of the windows, opened it, and walked out again. In another, it was a woman who came in with a mop and a pail, quickly mopped a small patch of floor, and went out again just as quickly. In a more vivid exercise, a man came in firing a pistol, and then rushed out at once. In none of these exercises was the intruder accurately described afterward.
Brown, Kling, and the police artist interviewed fourteen peoplethat Tuesday morning. Only one of themâSteve Carellaâwas a trained observer, but even he had difficulty describing the two shooters whoâd marched into the pizzeria at ten minutes past nine the day before. Of all the witnesses whoâd been there at the time, only two blacks and four whites remembered anything at all about the men. The white witnesses found it hard to say what the black shooter had looked like. If theyâd been asked to tell the difference between Morgan Freeman, Denzel Washington, Eddie Murphy, and Mike Tyson, thereâd have been no problem. Maybe. But when the police artist asked them to choose from representative eyes, noses, mouths, cheeks, chins, and foreheads, all at once all black men looked alike. Then again, they might have had similar difficulty describing an Asian suspect.
In the long runâlike many other decisions in Americaâthe result was premised on race. The blacks had better luck describing the black suspect, and the whites had better luck with the white one. The detectives were less than satisfied with what the artist finally delivered. They felt the composite sketches were ⦠well ⦠sketchy at best.
When Carella and Meyer