presenting the material but even the younger staffers who cowered in chairs along the wall.
âMy mom always used to tell me thisâthe guy never asked a question that he didnât know the answer to already,â said Walter C. âBuddyâ Reisinger Jr., a former Anheuser-Busch staffer whose mother married into the extended Busch family. âBut if he asked you a question, he really wants to know what you think, and you have 120 percent of that guyâs attention. While he is talking to you, you own him. He is so focused.â
âIf you saw any A-B presentation slide, itâd have 4,000 numbers jammed on it,â Reisinger said. âIt violates every PowerPoint presentation rule. You could have 300 numbers on this thing, and he would say âUh, that cost per barrel for Bud Light at the Cartersville plant . . . Jimmy, didnât you show me something last week that was a tenth of a cent off?â Itâs frightening. He could do that time after time on anything, anywhere, and youâre just trying to survive. The guy was âonâ 24 -7.â
That sort of atmosphere, where The Thirdâs commanding knowledge of the business piqued the jangling nerves of his staffers, clearly led some of them to trip up. There was nothing to fear in making a mistake, The Third preached. Making the same mistake twice, however, was another story. His patience for underperformance usually didnât stretch that far.
He formed a policy committee of 9 or 10 top executives within the company, which was later expanded into the strategy committee, and governed discussions using the Socratic method. Staffers were required to present and back up their own views on key issues, and were often formally pitted against each other in staged âdialectics,â with one team devoting weeks to preparing a âproâ view while the other evaluated the âcons.â
âHeâs demanding,â said one former strategy committee member. âHe asked a lot of questions, he was intense, focused. Anybody who told you it wasnât a little intimidating every time they got up would be lying to you. And anybody who told you they got used to it would be lying to you. But at a point, you look forward to it because of the intensity and the challenge.â
That challenge wasnât always overcome. The Thirdâs rebukes were harsh and, occasionally, career-ending. He fired plenty of staffers over the years. Most left the company or, if they worked for an ad agency, were assigned by their bosses to other accounts or regional offices. âIf you didnât do your work well, there was somebody else in line who could take your place. They had a lot of bench strength,â said an executive who climbed to Anheuserâs uppermost ranks.
The Thirdâs legion of subordinates busted their tails every day to earn his respect, putting in exhausting workweeks and traveling for long stretches away from their families. These were salt-of-the-earth Midwesternersâpeople who tended to marry their high school sweetheartsâand The Third demanded sacrifice. But he was compelling enough to get it.
âMr. Busch is just a great leader; he was a guy youâd do anything for,â one top executive said. âAnd if he patted you on the back, you felt like you could go for six more months because thatâs how much we all loved him and admired him. But heâs not a man who gives love back. That was the tough part.â
Helpful Anheuser ladder-climbers passed on certain pieces of advice to their less-experienced colleagues. Of utmost importance was that they knew their area of expertise inside and out, since it was a capital offense for a staffer to come up blank in front of August III on a subject he should understand. If that did happen, it was far better to tell him youâd return quickly with an answer rather than bluffing through a response. The Thirdâs bullshit detector was