us that the Druhyus would
later migrate farther north to Central Asia and turn into Mlechhas (or foreign
barbarians). 28 After that we hear nothing more of them. Another tribe called the Purus
survived into the Mahabharata epic and probably accounts for King Porus who fought
against the invading army of Alexander the Great in the fourth century BC .
Some of the tribes, however, appear to
have fled further afield after the great battle. Two of them have names that suggest
interesting possibilities: the Pakhta and the Parsu. The former are also mentioned
by later Greek sources as Pactyians and one wonders if they are the ancestors of
Pakhtun (or Pashtun) tribes that still live in Afghanistan and north-western Pakistan. This fits with the finding that, genetically
speaking, the Pashtuns are related to Indians and not to Central Asians or Arabs as
was previously thought.
Similarly, the Parsu are possibly
related to the Persians because this is the name by which the Assyrians refer to the
Persians in their inscriptions. This is not as fanciful a recreation of events as
may appear at first glance. There is a great deal of evidence that links the Rig
Vedic Indians to the ancient Persians. The Avesta, the oldest and most sacred text
of the Zoroastrian religion, is written in a language that is almost identical to
that of the Rig Veda. The older sections of the Avesta—called the
Gathas—are said to have been composed by the prophet Zarathustra himself.
They can be read as Rig Vedic Sanskrit by making a minor phonetic change. The
Avestan ‘h’ is the same as the Sanskrit ‘s’.
Thus, the word Sapta-Sindhu becomes Hapta-Hindu. 29 A similar phonetic shift survives in the modern Indian language of Assamese and
is easy to master.
The texts are clear that the Avestan
people came to Iran from outside. Unlike the Rig Vedic Indians, they are much more
self-consciously an ethnic group and call themselves the Aryan people. This makes
sense because they were the outsiders in a foreign land and would have wanted to
differentiate themselves. Moreover, they are aware of Sapta-Sindhu but not of
western Iran, suggesting that they entered the country from the east. Unlike the
Vedas, the ancient Persians also talk of an original ‘Aryan’
homeland and even name the river Helmand in Afghanistan after the Saraswati (i.e.
Harahvaiti). Indeed, the Persian identity as ‘Aryans’ was so
strong that their country would come to be known as theLand of
the Aryans or Iran. As recently as the late twentieth century, the Shah of Iran used
the title ‘Arya-mehr’ or Jewel of the Aryans. Contrast this with
the Indian identification with the Bharatas.
Another interesting indicator of the
sequence of events is the use of the terms ‘deva’ and
‘asura’. In the Rig Veda, the terms apply to different sets of
deities and do not have
clear connotations
of good and bad. The god Varun,
for instance, is described as an asura. However, in later Hinduism, the asuras would
be identified as demons and the devas as the gods. In contrast, devas refers to
demons in the Zoroastrian tradition of Persia while the word asura is transformed
into Ahura Mazda—the Great Lord. 30 Since the deva–asura dichotomy is not clear cut in the Rig Veda but
becomes very distinct in later texts, it is reasonable to argue that these opposing
sets of meaning came to be attached at a later date. What caused this separation?
Did the Parsu have a religious dispute with the Bharatas? As they moved into the
Middle East, was the Persian nomenclature influenced by the Assyrian god called
Assur? One may never know for sure but these are some more intriguing
possibilities.
There is a lot more evidence of
Vedic-related tribes in the Middle-East in the second millennium BC . In 1380 BC , the Hitties signed a treaty
with a people called the Mittani. This treaty is solemnized in the name of Vedic
Joy Nash, Jaide Fox, Michelle Pillow