Pakistani Punjab) and even parts of adjoining provinces. This is a very large
area.
Having traversed much of this terrain
and read and re-read the text, I have come to a somewhat different conclusion. The
Vedas clearly mention a wider landscape watered by
‘thrice-seven’ rivers 22 . While one does not have to take it literally as referring to twenty-one
rivers, it is obvious that the Sapta-Sindhu is a sub-set of the wider Vedic
landscape. In my view, the Indus and its tributaries were not a part of the
Sapta-Sindhu. The Indus has long been considered a ‘male’ river
in Indian tradition and would have not been called a sister. Indeed, it is notable
that the Indus and its tributaries are never described as ‘of seven
sisters’. My hunch is that the Sapta-Sindhu refers only to the Saraswati
and its own tributaries. Take for instance the following stanza:
‘Coming together,
glorious, loudly roaring—
Saraswati, Mother of Floods, the
seventh—
With copious milk, with fair streams strongly flowing,
Fully swelled by the volume of their waters’ 23
My reading of this stanza is that it
talks of how six rivers emptied into the Saraswati, the seventh. There are several
old river channels in the region, some of which still flow into the Ghaggar during
the monsoon season. These include the Chautang (often identified as the Vedic river
Drishadvati) and the Sarsuti. The Sutlej and the Yamuna were probably also counted
among the Saraswati’s sisters.
If my hunch is right, it would mean that
the Sapta-Sindhu was a much smaller area covering modern Haryana and a few of the
adjoining districts of eastern Punjab. Incidentally, this area also corresponds to
what ancient texts refer to asBrahmavarta—the Holy
Land—where Manu is said to have re-established civilization after the
flood. The texts define the Holy Land as lying between the Saraswati and the
Drishadvati—again roughly Haryana and a bit of north Rajasthan, but
excluding most of Punjab. So why was this small area so important? The people of the
Sapta-Sindhu were obviously part of a cultural milieu that covered a much larger
area. What was so special about these seven rivers? In my view the importance of the
Land of the Seven Rivers probably derives from it being the home of the Bharatas, a
tribe that would give Indians the name by which they call themselves.
THE BHARATAS
Although the Rig Veda is concerned
mostly with religion, the hymns do mention one event that is almost certainly
historical. This is often called the ‘Battle of the Ten Kings’
that occurred on the banks of the Ravi river in Punjab. 24 It appears that ten powerful tribes ganged up against the Bharata tribe and its
chieftain Sudasa. 25 The confederacy appears to have mainly consisted of tribes from what is now
western Punjab and the North West Frontier Province (both now in Pakistan). In
contrast, the Bharatas were an ‘eastern’ tribe from what is now
Haryana. 26 Despite the odds, the Bharatas crushed the confederacy in the battle. There are
descriptions of how the defeated warriors fled the battlefield or were drowned in
the Ravi.
As I stand on the edge of the Ghaggar
river in Haryana, I imagine the Bharata tribesmen fording the river on their way to
the great battle. As described in the Rig Veda, the warriorswould have been dressed in white robes, each with his long hair tied in a knot on
his head. There would have been horses neighing, bronze weapons shining in the sun
and perhaps the rhythmic sound of sage Vashishtha’s disciples chanting
hymns to the gods. The Saraswati was a sizeable river then, not the stream that I
see before me. Perhaps there would have been rafts ferrying men and supplies across
the river. As I stand watching the river, a few soldiers from the nearby army camp
wade knee-deep through the Ghaggar. They are Sikh soldiers, their hair knotted on
top of their heads. There are no
Stephanie Dray, Laura Kamoie