equity when he graduates. But talk to Don for a while and youâll notice that his voice is softer than those of his classmates, his head ever so slightly cocked, his grin a little tentative. Don is âa bitter introvert,â as he cheerfully puts itâbitter because the more time he spends at HBS, the more convinced he becomes that heâd better change his ways.
Don likes having a lot of time to himself, but thatâs not much of an option at HBS. His day begins early in the morning, when he meets for an hour and a half with his âLearning Teamââa pre-assigned study group in which participation is mandatory (students at HBS practically go to the bathroom in teams). He spends the rest of the morning in class, where ninety students sit together in a wood-paneled, U-shaped amphitheater with stadium seating. The professor usually kicks off by directing a student to describe the case study of the day, which is based on a real-life business scenarioâsay, a CEO whoâs considering changing her companyâs salary structure. The figure at the heart of the case study, in this case the CEO, is referred to as the âprotagonist.â
If you were the protagonist
, the professor asksâand soon you will be, is the implicationâ
what would you do?
The essence of the HBS education is that leaders have to act confidently and make decisions in the face of incomplete information. The teaching method plays with an age-old question: If you donât have all the factsâand often you wonâtâshould you wait to act until youâve collected as much data as possible? Or, by hesitating, do you risk losing othersâ trust and your own momentum? The answer isnât obvious. If you speak firmly on the basis of bad information, you can lead your people into disaster. But if you exude uncertainty, then morale suffers, funders wonât invest, and your organization can collapse.
The HBS teaching method implicitly comes down on the side ofcertainty. The CEO may not know the best way forward, but she has to act anyway. The HBS students, in turn, are expected to opine. Ideally, the student who was just cold-called has already discussed the case study with his Learning Team, so heâs ready to hold forth on the protagonistâs best moves. After he finishes, the professor encourages other students to offer their own views. Half of the studentsâ grade, and a much larger percentage of their social status, is based on whether they throw themselves into this fray. If a student talks often and forcefully, then heâs a player; if he doesnât, heâs on the margins.
Many of the students adapt easily to this system. But not Don. He has trouble elbowing his way into class discussions; in some classes he barely speaks at all. He prefers to contribute only when he believes he has something insightful to add, or honest-to-God disagrees with someone. This sounds reasonable, but Don feels as if he should be more comfortable talking just so he can fill up his share of available airtime.
Donâs HBS friends, who tend to be thoughtful, reflective types like him, spend a lot of time talking about talking in class. How much class participation is too much? How little is too little? When does publicly disagreeing with a classmate constitute healthy debate, and when does it seem competitive and judgmental? One of Donâs friends is worried because her professor sent around an e-mail saying that anyone with real-world experience on the dayâs case study should let him know in advance. Sheâs sure that the professorâs announcement was an effort to limit stupid remarks like the one she made in class last week. Another worries that heâs not loud enough. âI just have a naturally soft voice,â he says, âso when my voice sounds normal to others, I feel like Iâm shouting. I have to work on it.â
The school also tries hard to turn quiet