dress warmly. Winter seems to be on the way again. Cold, train air can give you a stiff neck and restrict your range of vision. You can only look straight ahead to your supposed destination, not to either side where those moments happen that make the journey worthwhile.
Emmi
Two days later
Subject: Just tell me â¦
⦠whether you
a) Delete my emails without reading them
b) Read my emails and then delete them
c) Read them and save them
d) Donât get any emails from me at all
Five hours later
Re:
c
The following morning
Subject: Good choice!
That was the best choice you could have made, Leo! And how elaborately youâve described, justified, and formulated it! Erm, has the effort of replying given you carpal tunnel syndrome, or is there something else on the way?
Best wishes,
Emmi
Two days later
Subject: Analysis of âcâ
Hi Leo,
You must have known the extent to which your first and only offering from the alphabet in sixteen weeks would lend wings to my fantasies. What could Leo the Language Psychologist possibly have wanted to say with an answer like that? What did he expect to achieve by it?
a) With that most minuscule written sign of life, was he hoping to gain a place in my personal book of Leo records?
b) Is he captivated by the notion that the recipient of the âcâ will spend at least an hour with her therapist pondering the difference between âcâ followed by full stop, âcâ with a full stop and parenthesis, and âcâ stripped bare, au natur , as Leike created it?
c) Was âdropping me a lineâ in this perfectionist, minimalist way an attempt to come across (yet again) as more interesting than the situation warranted?
d) Or was it purely content-driven? Was he trying to say: Yes, I am reading Emmiâs emails, Iâll even keep saving them, but Iâm definitely not going to go on writing to her? And Iâm being polite and telling her so. Iâm sending her a signal, a feeble signal, but at least itâs a signal, even if itâs the smallest signal possible, still, itâs a signal. Iâm sending her a chickenâs toe ring with a bite taken out of it. Was that it?
In joyful expectation of another âletterâ from you,
Emmi
Three hours later
Re:
A question of my own, dear Emmi: When you say THE END so definitively (as you last did sixteen weeks ago, the day after ⦠you might remember what it was the day after), what do you actually mean?
a) THE END?
b) THE END?
c) THE END?
d) THE END?
And why canât you stick with either a), b), c), or d)?
Thirty minutes later
Re:
1) Because I like writing.
2) O.K.: because I like writing to YOU.
3) Because my therapist says it does me good, and she should know, she studied it.
4) Because I was curious to know how long you would manage not to write to me.
5) Because I was even more curious what your answer would be. (I admit, Iâd never have guessed it would be âc.â)
6) Because I was and still am even more curious to find out how you were.
7) Because these kinds of curiosities for external things improve the air around here, the atmosphere in my tiny, sterile, empty new flat with the silent piano and bare walls, which keep on flinging baffled question marks in my face. A flat that has set me back fifteen years in one fell swoop, but without making me fifteen years younger as a result. And now, at thirty-five, Iâm at the bottom of a twenty-year-oldâs stairwell. Which means Iâve got to climb all those stairs again.
8) Where were we? Oh yes, at âThe End,â and why I donât mean âThe Endâ when I say it: because there are certain things I see quite differently from how I saw them sixteen weeks ago, if perhaps less conclusively.
9) Because the end doesnât quite mean the end, doesnât quite mean the end, doesnât quite mean the end, Leo. Because in the end, each end is also a